H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jozef Kovalik vs Igor Sijsling H2H: 1-0
Jozef Kovalik holds a 1–0 lead over Igor Sijsling in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jozef Kovalik leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jozef Kovalik won the 2016 Munich fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Slovakia
Age 33
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 38
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2017* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q1 | Clay | Jozef Kovalik | 6-4 (ret.) | Igor Sijsling | Match data |
| Apr 29, 2016* | Munich | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jozef Kovalik | 6-3 6-4 | Igor Sijsling | Match data |
| Apr 25, 2016 | Munich | ATP 250 | Q2 | Clay | Igor Sijsling | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Jozef Kovalik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jozef Kovalik | #591 | #80 | 701 | 1,758 | 26 | 46 | 36.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Igor Sijsling | #854 | #52 | 910 | 1,794 | 44 | 84 | 34.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jozef Kovalik | Igor Sijsling | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #525 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #200 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #165 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #68 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #85 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #139 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 9–25 | 26.5% | #84 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #131 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #145 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #149 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #177 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #137 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #228 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |