H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jozef Kovalik vs Vasek Pospisil H2H: 0-1
Vasek Pospisil holds a 1–0 lead over Jozef Kovalik in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vasek Pospisil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vasek Pospisil won the 2016 US Open first round 6-1 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Slovakia
Age 33
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 36
Right-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2016* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Vasek Pospisil | 6-1 6-3 6-3 | Jozef Kovalik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jozef Kovalik | #591 | #80 | 701 | 1,758 | 26 | 46 | 36.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vasek Pospisil | #1,265 | #25 | 1,359 | 1,958 | 122 | 161 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jozef Kovalik | Vasek Pospisil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #119 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #165 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #53 | 1,808 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #85 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #139 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #133 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #131 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #108 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #149 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #137 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #149 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #228 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #61 | 1,926 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2024 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #98 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #733 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1265 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |