H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Juan Antonio Marin vs Agustin Calleri H2H: 1-1
Juan Antonio Marin and Agustin Calleri are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Agustin Calleri won the 2006 Buenos Aires fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRC
Age 51
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 49
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2006* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Agustin Calleri | 6-4 6-2 | Juan Antonio Marin | Match data |
| Apr 29, 2005* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Juan Antonio Marin | 6-4 3-1 (ret.) | Agustin Calleri | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Antonio Marin | #1,145 | #55 | 809 | 1,658 | 75 | 118 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Agustin Calleri | #894 | #16 | 1,405 | 1,902 | 199 | 182 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Antonio Marin | Agustin Calleri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #217 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1997 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #87 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #70 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #62 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #70 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #67 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #120 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #50 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #130 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #24 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2002 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #247 | 1,529 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,498 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #42 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2006 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,447 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #60 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1127 | 1,421 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #391 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |