H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Juan Antonio Marin vs Cecil Mamiit H2H: 0-1
Cecil Mamiit holds a 1–0 lead over Juan Antonio Marin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Cecil Mamiit leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cecil Mamiit won the 1999 Boston third round 7-6(1) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRC
Age 51
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
PHI
Age 50
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 1999* | Boston | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Cecil Mamiit | 7-6(1) 6-4 | Juan Antonio Marin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Antonio Marin | #1,145 | #55 | 809 | 1,658 | 75 | 118 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Cecil Mamiit | #1,573 | #72 | 625 | 1,633 | 48 | 95 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Antonio Marin | Cecil Mamiit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #217 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #229 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #87 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #70 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #93 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #70 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #120 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #111 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #130 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #111 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #183 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #247 | 1,529 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #226 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,498 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,447 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1127 | 1,421 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #462 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |