H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Juan Antonio Marin vs Davide Sanguinetti H2H: 2-1
Juan Antonio Marin holds a 2–1 lead over Davide Sanguinetti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Juan Antonio Marin leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Juan Antonio Marin won the 2006 Amersfoort third round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRC
Age 51
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 53
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2006* | Amersfoort | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Juan Antonio Marin | 6-2 7-5 | Davide Sanguinetti | Match data |
| Nov 6, 1998* | Bogota | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Davide Sanguinetti | 6-4 7-5 | Juan Antonio Marin | Match data |
| Jul 31, 1998* | Umag | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Juan Antonio Marin | 7-6(4) 3-6 6-3 | Davide Sanguinetti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Antonio Marin | #1,145 | #55 | 809 | 1,658 | 75 | 118 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Davide Sanguinetti | #1,080 | #42 | 874 | 1,771 | 157 | 233 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Antonio Marin | Davide Sanguinetti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #217 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #87 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #70 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1999 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #70 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #95 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #120 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #48 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #130 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #65 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #247 | 1,529 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 10–27 | 27.0% | #91 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,498 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #46 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2006 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,447 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #110 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1127 | 1,421 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #107 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #270 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 |