H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Juan Antonio Marin vs Fernando Meligeni H2H: 1-2
Fernando Meligeni holds a 2–1 lead over Juan Antonio Marin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Fernando Meligeni leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Antonio Marin won the 2003 Acapulco third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRC
Age 51
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 55
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2003* | Acapulco | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Juan Antonio Marin | 6-1 6-4 | Fernando Meligeni | Match data |
| Aug 16, 2000* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Fernando Meligeni | 6-7(4) 6-0 6-1 | Juan Antonio Marin | Match data |
| Apr 15, 1999* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Fernando Meligeni | 6-2 6-2 | Juan Antonio Marin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Antonio Marin | #1,145 | #55 | 809 | 1,658 | 75 | 118 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Fernando Meligeni | #675 | #25 | 1,316 | 1,888 | 185 | 199 | 48.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Antonio Marin | Fernando Meligeni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #217 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #87 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #99 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #70 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #91 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #70 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #64 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2000 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #120 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #94 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2001 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #130 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #67 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2002 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,655 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #247 | 1,529 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #29 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,498 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2006 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,447 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1127 | 1,421 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #210 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 |