H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Juan Antonio Marin vs Hugo Armando H2H: 1-0
Juan Antonio Marin holds a 1–0 lead over Hugo Armando in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Juan Antonio Marin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Juan Antonio Marin won the 2006 Vina Del Mar third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRC
Age 51
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2006* | Vina Del Mar | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Juan Antonio Marin | 6-2 6-3 | Hugo Armando | Match data |
| May 29, 2001* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q2 | Clay | Juan Antonio Marin | 4-6 7-6(5) 5-3 (ret.) | Hugo Armando | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Antonio Marin | #1,145 | #55 | 809 | 1,658 | 75 | 118 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Hugo Armando | #1,126 | #100 | 403 | 1,581 | 13 | 30 | 30.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Antonio Marin | Hugo Armando | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #217 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1997 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #87 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #70 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #70 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #120 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #130 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #161 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #178 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #247 | 1,529 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #203 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,498 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #227 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #458 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2006 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,447 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1127 | 1,421 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |