H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Juan Antonio Marin vs Markus Hipfl H2H: 1-1
Juan Antonio Marin and Markus Hipfl are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Juan Antonio Marin won the 2000 St. Poelten quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRC
Age 51
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 48
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2000* | St. Poelten | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Juan Antonio Marin | 6-3 6-4 | Markus Hipfl | Match data |
| May 20, 1999* | St. Poelten | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Markus Hipfl | 6-1 6-1 | Juan Antonio Marin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Antonio Marin | #1,145 | #55 | 809 | 1,658 | 75 | 118 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Markus Hipfl | #1,538 | #63 | 678 | 1,686 | 55 | 78 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Antonio Marin | Markus Hipfl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #768 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1275 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #451 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #217 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #87 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #119 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #70 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #76 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #70 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #125 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #120 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #130 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2002 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #247 | 1,529 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,498 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,447 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1127 | 1,421 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |