H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 19:16 UTC
Juan Antonio Marin vs M. Lee H2H: 0-1
M. Lee holds a 1–0 lead over Juan Antonio Marin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, M. Lee leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, M. Lee won the 2000 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-4 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRC
Age 51
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 48
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2000* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | M. Lee | 6-2 6-4 7-6(3) | Juan Antonio Marin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Antonio Marin | #1,145 | #55 | 809 | 1,658 | 75 | 118 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| M. Lee | #1,474 | #94 | 429 | 1,594 | 19 | 42 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Antonio Marin | M. Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #618 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #265 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #334 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #217 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #273 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #87 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #70 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #105 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #70 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #203 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #120 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #599 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #130 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2002 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #247 | 1,529 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #304 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,498 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,447 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1127 | 1,421 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |