H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Juan Antonio Marin vs Paul Haarhuis H2H: 1-1
Juan Antonio Marin and Paul Haarhuis are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Juan Antonio Marin won the 1998 Umag quarterfinal 6-2 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRC
Age 51
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 1998* | Umag | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Juan Antonio Marin | 6-2 7-6(2) | Paul Haarhuis | Match data |
| Jul 24, 1997* | Umag | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Paul Haarhuis | 6-4 7-6(4) | Juan Antonio Marin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Antonio Marin | #1,145 | #55 | 809 | 1,658 | 75 | 118 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Paul Haarhuis | #623 | #18 | 1,341 | 1,885 | 250 | 245 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Antonio Marin | Paul Haarhuis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #217 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1997 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #87 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #70 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #70 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #120 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #130 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #39 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #42 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #247 | 1,529 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,498 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #25 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2006 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,447 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1127 | 1,421 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #178 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |