H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Juan Antonio Marin vs Renzo Furlan H2H: 2-0

Juan Antonio Marin holds a 2–0 lead over Renzo Furlan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Juan Antonio Marin leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Juan Antonio Marin won the 1998 Croatia Open Umag round of 32 4-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Juan Antonio Marin
CRC Age 51 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Renzo Furlan
ITA Age 56 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Juan Antonio Marin #101 4-6 6-3 6-4 Renzo Furlan #172 Match data Jul 30, 1998* R32 Croatia Open Umag ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Juan Antonio Marin #82 4-6 6-4 6-0 Renzo Furlan #125 Match data Mar 26, 1998* R32 Casablanca ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Juan Antonio Marin #1,145 #55 809 1,657 75 119 38.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Renzo Furlan #1,479 #19 1,235 1,864 214 233 47.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Juan Antonio Marin Renzo Furlan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1989 3–5 37.5% #222 1,500 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1990 9–8 52.9% #77 1,597 0 0
21 1996 0–1 0.0% #217 1,494 0 0 1991 22–26 45.8% #52 1,664 0 0
22 1997 9–13 40.9% #87 1,528 0 0 1992 26–29 47.3% #53 1,682 0 0
23 1998 20–27 42.6% #70 1,608 0 0 1993 26–28 48.1% #72 1,682 0 0
24 1999 19–21 47.5% #70 1,636 0 1 1994 30–27 52.6% #41 1,664 0 2
25 2000 9–21 30.0% #120 1,499 0 1 1995 37–31 54.4% #29 1,729 0 2
26 2001 6–5 54.5% #130 1,605 0 1 1996 32–27 54.2% #40 1,706 0 2
27 2002 4–8 33.3% #145 1,568 0 1 1997 18–27 40.0% #100 1,581 0 2
28 2003 1–3 25.0% #247 1,528 0 1 1998 2–8 20.0% #144 1,514 0 2
29 2004 0–2 0.0% #277 1,496 0 1 1999 3–5 37.5% #225 1,542 0 2
30 2005 3–5 37.5% #113 1,513 0 1 2000 3–4 42.9% #236 1,569 0 2
31 2006 4–12 25.0% #184 1,447 0 1 2001 1–1 50.0% #190 1,554 0 2
32 2007 0–1 0.0% #1127 1,421 0 1 2002 1–3 25.0% #186 1,540 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2003 1–4 20.0% #194 1,547 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Juan Antonio Marin Renzo Furlan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — —
21 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 1 7 8 12.5% 20 17 37 54.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1992 0 7 7 0.0% 25 20 45 55.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 20 20 40 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 23 21 44 52.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 16 12 28 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 10 7 17 58.8% 17 16 33 51.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2000 1 7 8 12.5% 8 13 21 38.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 17 10 27 63.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 9 18 50.0%
26 2001 — — — — 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 1996 17 13 30 56.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2%
27 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
28 2003 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
29 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
30 2005 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2000 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
31 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 4 11 15 26.7% — — — — — — — — 2001 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 4 21 25 16.0% 71 90 161 44.1% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — 55 68 123 44.7% 127 128 255 49.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 29 31 60 48.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 31/31 of Juan Antonio Marin's and 351/422 of Renzo Furlan's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Juan Antonio Marin Renzo Furlan
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 43/48 1.4 1.2 62.8% 62.2% 48.8% 50.4% 49.3% 57.0% 42.8%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 44/55 1.9 0.9 62.9% 62.7% 49.8% 53.1% 47.2% 58.0% 43.1%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 46/54 2.4 1.5 58.4% 66.3% 50.5% 53.8% 44.3% 59.5% 39.9%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 49/57 2.9 1.5 57.4% 67.6% 49.6% 48.4% 49.0% 59.8% 41.8%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 57/68 3.4 1.9 57.4% 69.3% 50.5% 56.3% 46.0% 61.1% 38.3%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 46/59 3.9 1.7 61.2% 69.4% 51.0% 57.8% 42.8% 62.2% 38.8%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 36/45 5.5 3.3 53.3% 74.5% 49.7% 60.0% 40.7% 62.5% 36.8%
28 2003 4/4 2.5 1.5 52.2% 56.5% 45.2% 18.1% 58.3% 49.5% 36.3% 1998 7/10 7.0 3.3 50.2% 71.6% 43.1% 58.8% 35.2% 57.1% 32.8%
29 2004 2/2 2.0 0.5 44.8% 63.6% 41.9% 53.6% 50.0% 52.0% 27.9% 1999 6/8 2.2 2.7 55.0% 60.1% 37.9% 53.7% 26.4% 50.3% 33.8%
30 2005 8/8 2.0 1.4 49.4% 58.4% 49.8% 47.1% 31.6% 53.7% 41.9% 2000 6/7 3.8 2.2 56.0% 65.0% 54.5% 66.4% 42.1% 60.2% 33.3%
31 2006 16/16 2.9 1.1 53.0% 68.4% 48.3% 46.4% 51.8% 59.4% 37.6% 2001 2/2 2.0 2.0 49.9% 73.7% 46.4% 36.7% 41.7% 60.0% 35.2%
32 2007 1/1 2.0 3.0 43.5% 55.0% 26.9% 28.6% 25.0% 39.1% 38.9% 2002 4/4 1.5 2.8 57.6% 66.1% 50.3% 50.7% 69.8% 59.3% 33.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 5/5 3.4 1.2 60.8% 64.4% 57.8% 49.2% 37.6% 61.8% 37.5%
Career — 31/194 2.5 1.3 51.1% 63.5% 47.2% 42.8% 46.5% 55.5% 38.0% — 351/447 3.1 1.7 58.8% 67.2% 49.8% 54.2% 45.3% 59.8% 39.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Juan Antonio Marin Renzo Furlan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1501 106.7 — — — — — +10 — 35.0% -0.45 2–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.66
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1598 130.3 — — — — — +44 — 50.0% -0.03 3–1 (75%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -0.03
21 1996 1495 99.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.18 1991 1664 137.7 -2.73 +1.94 0.994 49.8% -177 +91 — 47.1% -0.41 8–12 (40%) 12–4 (75%) 105.4 +0.30
22 1997 1528 120.5 — — — — — +56 — 40.0% -0.72 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 102.5 +0.35 1992 1682 140.0 -1.77 +2.85 1.025 50.4% -235 +91 — 47.4% +0.01 8–10 (44%) 3–8 (27%) 96.1 -0.66
23 1998 1608 122.5 — — — — -133 +61 — 40.7% -0.57 11–5 (69%) 9–9 (50%) 108.0 +1.23 1993 1683 138.8 -0.24 +0.57 0.985 49.6% -226 +82 — 48.0% -0.09 7–8 (47%) 7–7 (50%) 98.6 +0.10
24 1999 1636 123.4 — — — — -158 +101 — 41.9% -0.46 8–4 (67%) 10–8 (56%) 107.2 +1.38 1994 1665 140.9 -0.31 +2.54 1.038 50.5% -28 +39 — 48.9% +0.01 13–10 (57%) 11–9 (55%) 105.7 +0.67
25 2000 1499 104.6 — — — — -91 +104 — 30.0% -1.64 3–4 (43%) 4–5 (44%) 96.8 +0.29 1995 1729 142.6 -0.32 +0.37 0.982 49.7% +21 -5 — 51.8% +0.17 14–3 (82%) 9–14 (39%) 105.7 +0.88
26 2001 1605 120.8 — — — — — +62 — 53.6% +0.11 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.19 1996 1706 139.0 +0.16 +1.18 1.029 50.3% -16 +54 -123 51.0% +0.01 14–7 (67%) 11–11 (50%) 105.1 -0.21
27 2002 1568 109.5 — — — — — +47 — 30.8% -1.19 2–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.11 1997 1582 130.5 +0.90 -1.60 0.981 49.4% +41 +103 — 42.6% -0.40 9–10 (47%) 14–12 (54%) 100.5 +1.02
28 2003 1529 105.2 -2.63 -0.24 0.719 42.7% — +39 — 33.3% -1.00 — — — +0.24 1998 1514 109.9 -1.66 -1.48 0.763 46.0% +69 +109 — 32.1% -1.21 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — +0.35
29 2004 1497 101.2 -0.87 -2.28 0.581 41.4% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — -0.23 1999 1542 115.4 -3.93 -1.08 0.680 42.1% — +87 — 33.3% -1.83 2–0 3–0 (100%) — -0.45
30 2005 1513 107.2 -3.53 +1.01 0.906 47.7% — +39 — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.01 2000 1569 111.4 -1.39 -1.97 0.838 47.4% +18 +59 — 41.2% -0.94 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.23
31 2006 1447 110.0 -2.56 -0.94 0.928 48.6% — +22 — 27.0% -0.92 1–2 (33%) 0–7 (0%) 93.7 +0.70 2001 1555 106.0 -2.11 +1.56 0.881 47.7% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.18
32 2007 1421 97.0 -4.56 -2.34 0.639 39.0% — — — — — — — — +0.15 2002 1540 109.9 -1.86 -0.38 0.813 46.7% — — — 33.3% -0.56 0–1 1–1 — +0.32
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1548 103.2 -1.68 -0.29 0.984 49.5% +59 — — 10.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.07
Career — 1658 119.1 -2.77 -0.48 0.854 46.9% -131 +67 — 37.4% -0.82 29–19 (60%) 28–36 (44%) 104.6 +1.98 — 1865 140.8 -0.75 +0.99 0.987 49.7% -29 +67 -123 47.0% -0.18 84–67 (56%) 74–76 (49%) 104.6 +0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.