H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Juan Carlos Ferrero vs Daniel Vacek H2H: 1-0

Juan Carlos Ferrero holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Vacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Juan Carlos Ferrero leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Juan Carlos Ferrero won the 1999 Austrian Open Kitzbühel round of 16 7-6(1) 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Juan Carlos Ferrero
ESP Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Daniel Vacek
CZE Age 55 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Juan Carlos Ferrero #76 7-6(1) 6-0 Daniel Vacek #52 Match data Jul 30, 1999* R16 Austrian Open Kitzbühel ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Juan Carlos Ferrero #968 #1 4,570 2,096 461 256 64.3% 1 4 0 2 9 16
Daniel Vacek #1,133 #26 1,151 1,821 171 220 43.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Juan Carlos Ferrero Daniel Vacek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1999 16–8 66.7% #42 1,686 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2000 41–26 61.2% #12 1,800 0 1 1991 1–3 25.0% #470 1,490 0 0
21 2001 56–20 73.7% #5 1,878 0 5 — — — — — — —
22 2002 47–24 66.2% #4 1,918 0 7 1993 13–22 37.1% #114 1,559 0 0
23 2003 63–18 77.8% #3 2,006 1 11 1994 25–27 48.1% #45 1,732 0 0
24 2004 20–16 55.6% #31 1,746 1 11 1995 30–31 49.2% #27 1,797 0 0
25 2005 45–26 63.4% #17 1,842 1 11 1996 23–29 44.2% #71 1,692 0 0
26 2006 28–23 54.9% #23 1,741 1 11 1997 19–26 42.2% #53 1,669 0 0
27 2007 34–23 59.6% #24 1,833 1 11 1998 25–29 46.3% #50 1,671 0 0
28 2008 21–15 58.3% #55 1,850 1 11 1999 29–31 48.3% #43 1,740 0 0
29 2009 33–20 62.3% #23 1,927 1 12 2000 4–13 23.5% #238 1,628 0 0
30 2010 33–14 70.2% #29 1,887 1 15 2001 2–7 22.2% #393 1,595 0 0
31 2011 20–11 64.5% #50 1,925 1 16 2002 0–2 0.0% #749 1,577 0 0
32 2012 4–12 25.0% #213 1,795 1 16 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Juan Carlos Ferrero Daniel Vacek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1999 0 2 2 0.0% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 20 16 36 55.6% 18 7 25 72.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1991 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2001 18 12 30 60.0% 33 5 38 86.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2002 22 13 35 62.9% 20 7 27 74.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1993 7 9 16 43.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
23 2003 30 12 42 71.4% 29 4 33 87.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 10 11 21 47.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 7 16 56.3%
24 2004 13 10 23 56.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 11 11 22 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 14 10 24 58.3%
25 2005 18 13 31 58.1% 20 9 29 69.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 10 11 21 47.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
26 2006 10 11 21 47.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1997 6 11 17 35.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
27 2007 10 10 20 50.0% 20 11 31 64.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1998 17 17 34 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0%
28 2008 14 9 23 60.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1999 20 17 37 54.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
29 2009 9 11 20 45.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2010 5 5 10 50.0% 28 7 35 80.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2001 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 2011 9 7 16 56.3% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — — — — — 2002 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 178 134 312 57.1% 236 92 328 72.0% 30 17 47 63.8% 17 13 30 56.7% — 87 105 192 45.3% 22 42 64 34.4% 17 23 40 42.5% 45 50 95 47.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 472/479 of Juan Carlos Ferrero's and 346/391 of Daniel Vacek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Juan Carlos Ferrero Daniel Vacek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 4/4 3.8 2.8 61.6% 71.4% 42.5% 43.4% 19.0% 59.1% 34.1%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 32/35 6.8 4.4 60.0% 72.6% 54.6% 58.6% 34.4% 65.5% 31.8%
23 2003 76/81 5.4 2.9 60.1% 72.9% 55.4% 58.7% 44.8% 66.0% 41.7% 1994 49/52 7.0 5.4 59.5% 74.6% 50.5% 56.6% 36.0% 65.1% 34.7%
24 2004 34/36 5.8 2.6 61.9% 70.6% 55.2% 63.8% 31.0% 64.6% 36.3% 1995 50/61 8.1 4.3 59.9% 75.7% 51.4% 61.3% 37.4% 65.9% 35.7%
25 2005 71/71 3.1 1.7 66.6% 68.7% 55.4% 64.7% 40.0% 64.0% 40.1% 1996 48/52 7.3 5.1 56.7% 76.2% 49.0% 53.1% 39.3% 64.6% 33.5%
26 2006 51/51 4.2 1.4 68.8% 68.4% 52.3% 53.7% 37.6% 63.6% 38.8% 1997 41/45 8.2 6.8 51.8% 76.0% 46.0% 59.0% 36.2% 61.5% 34.9%
27 2007 57/57 4.0 1.7 68.0% 68.0% 54.2% 60.3% 40.0% 63.3% 39.9% 1998 46/54 7.0 5.1 56.6% 74.9% 47.3% 61.9% 39.4% 62.8% 35.5%
28 2008 36/36 4.3 1.4 66.4% 71.2% 54.4% 64.8% 48.1% 65.5% 37.4% 1999 50/60 4.7 4.6 56.5% 70.1% 47.7% 64.0% 37.1% 60.1% 36.2%
29 2009 53/53 4.3 1.6 66.8% 67.7% 54.2% 56.6% 45.3% 62.9% 38.6% 2000 15/17 4.2 5.4 53.6% 64.8% 40.6% 42.9% 30.9% 53.9% 30.4%
30 2010 47/47 2.2 1.1 71.6% 69.1% 59.1% 49.7% 47.4% 65.8% 43.0% 2001 9/9 6.8 3.4 54.2% 67.3% 50.2% 50.6% 27.2% 59.5% 29.2%
31 2011 31/31 2.9 1.9 63.2% 66.8% 56.8% 60.9% 40.0% 63.0% 40.0% 2002 2/2 5.0 2.5 58.4% 71.8% 37.5% 45.7% 36.5% 57.6% 36.6%
32 2012 16/16 2.6 1.4 66.7% 64.6% 48.7% 50.6% 24.4% 59.3% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 472/717 4.0 1.8 65.9% 69.3% 54.9% 58.8% 41.3% 64.2% 39.7% — 346/391 6.8 5.0 57.1% 73.7% 48.8% 58.1% 36.5% 63.0% 34.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Juan Carlos Ferrero Daniel Vacek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1999 1686 142.0 — — — — -138 +89 — 60.0% +0.63 7–3 (70%) 6–3 (67%) 111.1 +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 1800 148.8 — — — — -64 +139 — 55.4% +0.23 17–7 (71%) 16–18 (47%) 106.6 -2.52 1991 1490 102.2 -1.04 -0.09 0.834 46.2% — — — 22.2% -1.67 — 1–0 — +0.10
21 2001 1878 157.3 — — — — -95 +220 -268 67.7% +1.22 15–11 (58%) 20–16 (56%) 103.4 +0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2002 1918 154.2 — — — — -41 +161 — 58.9% +0.57 19–9 (68%) 17–13 (57%) 104.6 -0.82 1993 1560 126.4 +2.79 -4.51 0.922 49.1% -2 +9 -4 41.1% -0.61 3–7 (30%) 7–9 (44%) 97.5 +0.29
23 2003 2007 158.9 +3.93 +4.21 1.225 53.4% -30 +145 -298 70.9% +1.30 15–4 (79%) 18–13 (58%) 105.5 +0.35 1994 1732 143.4 +3.08 -2.24 0.992 49.9% -14 -131 -90 47.5% -0.12 12–9 (57%) 13–15 (46%) 103.3 -1.41
24 2004 1747 128.6 +1.06 -0.36 1.027 50.3% +51 +269 -36 56.0% +0.22 5–6 (45%) 15–9 (63%) 94.2 +1.57 1995 1798 148.9 +3.89 -1.17 1.046 50.7% +14 -171 -195 48.7% +0.03 10–11 (48%) 15–18 (45%) 98.8 -1.99
25 2005 1842 151.4 +2.55 +2.95 1.115 51.9% -52 +143 -11 58.6% +0.45 14–10 (58%) 17–12 (59%) 103.5 -2.96 1996 1692 140.7 +2.32 -3.52 0.945 49.3% +10 -77 -50 45.5% -0.25 12–11 (52%) 14–11 (56%) 101.0 -2.02
26 2006 1742 138.7 +1.38 +1.19 1.068 50.9% -15 +121 +98 53.7% +0.29 10–10 (50%) 11–7 (61%) 97.2 +2.03 1997 1670 134.8 -0.60 -1.91 0.906 48.1% +38 -50 -60 41.8% -0.61 6–7 (46%) 13–12 (52%) 100.7 -0.33
27 2007 1833 151.3 +0.46 +2.46 1.089 51.4% -51 +18 +67 56.8% +0.36 11–8 (58%) 14–10 (58%) 103.6 +2.65 1998 1672 143.3 +0.67 -1.11 0.956 49.4% +16 -20 -40 48.1% -0.21 6–8 (43%) 13–10 (57%) 102.7 +0.31
28 2008 1850 156.7 +2.12 +1.77 1.085 51.3% +31 -4 — 61.0% +0.67 4–3 (57%) 3–6 (33%) 97.5 -1.14 1999 1741 133.9 -1.09 -1.27 0.909 48.6% +1 -191 -65 46.2% -0.17 9–4 (69%) 7–11 (39%) 104.5 +0.89
29 2009 1928 151.7 +0.61 +1.78 1.042 50.7% -70 -4 +108 56.9% +0.38 10–5 (67%) 10–10 (50%) 102.6 -3.54 2000 1629 122.6 -4.37 -4.38 0.659 42.4% +53 -125 — 27.5% -2.08 1–2 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 -1.16
30 2010 1887 151.5 +2.13 +4.36 1.258 53.9% -65 +143 — 64.9% +1.12 9–7 (56%) 7–7 (50%) 98.1 +3.73 2001 1595 122.1 -0.70 -2.81 0.721 45.3% +49 — — 23.8% -1.67 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.96
31 2011 1926 148.5 +0.68 +2.08 1.083 51.3% -48 +104 — 56.6% +0.30 8–4 (67%) 8–2 (80%) 108.2 +0.69 2002 1578 111.7 +0.38 -0.21 0.865 46.5% — — — 16.7% -1.17 — 0–2 — -0.38
32 2012 1795 134.7 -1.29 +0.49 0.883 47.1% +21 +87 — 33.3% -1.19 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 93.7 -1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2096 156.9 +1.74 +2.44 1.109 51.7% -39 +122 -3 59.8% +0.60 145–91 (61%) 165–130 (56%) 106.0 -0.14 — 1822 143.7 +1.22 -2.21 0.930 48.9% +12 -96 -70 44.3% -0.37 59–59 (50%) 88–91 (49%) 102.9 -1.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.