H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Juan Carlos Ferrero vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 4-3

Juan Carlos Ferrero holds a 4–3 lead over Jurgen Melzer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Jurgen Melzer leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Juan Carlos Ferrero leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jurgen Melzer won the 2010 US Open third round 7-5 6-3 6-1.

ESP Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 3
7 main draw meetings
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 5, 2010* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Jurgen Melzer #15 7-5 6-3 6-1 Juan Carlos Ferrero #24 Match data
Oct 10, 2008* Vienna ATP 500 R16 Hard Jurgen Melzer #38 7-6(4) 6-3 Juan Carlos Ferrero #44 Match data
Jan 11, 2008* Auckland ATP 250 R16 Hard Juan Carlos Ferrero #24 6-3 7-6(6) Jurgen Melzer #62 Match data
Oct 12, 2006* Vienna ATP 250 R32 Hard Jurgen Melzer #39 5-7 7-6(5) 6-3 Juan Carlos Ferrero #17 Match data
Jun 23, 2006* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 R16 Grass Juan Carlos Ferrero #28 4-6 6-3 6-4 Jurgen Melzer #78 Match data
May 11, 2005* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Juan Carlos Ferrero #39 6-3 7-5 Jurgen Melzer #35 Match data
Aug 29, 2003* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Juan Carlos Ferrero #3 1-6 7-6(2) 6-2 6-4 Jurgen Melzer #81 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Juan Carlos Ferrero #968 #1 4,570 2,096 457 254 64.3% 1 4 0 0 11 16
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,024 326 303 51.8% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Juan Carlos Ferrero Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 1999 16–8 66.7% #42 1,686 0 1 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 2000 38–25 60.3% #12 1,802 0 1 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 2001 56–20 73.7% #5 1,878 0 5 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,659 0 0
22 2002 47–24 66.2% #4 1,918 0 7 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,584 0 0
23 2003 63–18 77.8% #3 2,005 1 11 2004 27–22 55.1% #39 1,769 0 0
24 2004 19–15 55.9% #31 1,751 1 11 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 2005 45–26 63.4% #17 1,841 1 11 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,780 0 1
26 2006 28–23 54.9% #23 1,740 1 11 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,695 0 1
27 2007 34–23 59.6% #24 1,833 1 11 2008 26–23 53.1% #34 1,778 0 1
28 2008 21–15 58.3% #55 1,845 1 11 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,924 0 2
29 2009 33–20 62.3% #23 1,924 1 12 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,998 0 3
30 2010 33–14 70.2% #29 1,887 1 15 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,799 0 3
31 2011 20–11 64.5% #50 1,924 1 16 2012 18–22 45.0% #29 1,758 0 4
32 2012 4–12 25.0% #213 1,794 1 16 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,825 0 5
33 2014 12–19 38.7% #113 1,758 0 5
34 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,770 0 5
36 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,703 0 5