H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Juan Carlos Ferrero vs Thomas Enqvist H2H: 2-1
Juan Carlos Ferrero holds a 2–1 lead over Thomas Enqvist in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Juan Carlos Ferrero leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Juan Carlos Ferrero won the 2002 Canada Masters second round 7-6(5) 6-7(4) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2002* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Juan Carlos Ferrero | 7-6(5) 6-7(4) 7-5 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| Oct 18, 2001* | Stuttgart Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Thomas Enqvist | 4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | Juan Carlos Ferrero | Match data |
| Jun 6, 2001* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Juan Carlos Ferrero | 6-2 6-4 6-2 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Carlos Ferrero | #968 | #1 | 4,570 | 2,096 | 457 | 254 | 64.3% | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 16 |
| Thomas Enqvist | #548 | #4 | 2,693 | 2,013 | 422 | 281 | 60.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 19 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Carlos Ferrero | Thomas Enqvist | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1103 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #231 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #63 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1999 | 16–8 | 66.7% | #42 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2000 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #12 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2001 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,878 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 63–22 | 74.1% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 2002 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #4 | 1,918 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 49–25 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,980 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 2003 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #3 | 2,005 | 1 | 11 | 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,873 | 0 | 11 |
| 24 | 2004 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #31 | 1,751 | 1 | 11 | 1998 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #22 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 2005 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #17 | 1,841 | 1 | 11 | 1999 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #4 | 1,913 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 2006 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #23 | 1,740 | 1 | 11 | 2000 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #9 | 1,906 | 0 | 18 |
| 27 | 2007 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,833 | 1 | 11 | 2001 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,848 | 0 | 18 |
| 28 | 2008 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #55 | 1,845 | 1 | 11 | 2002 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #44 | 1,792 | 0 | 19 |
| 29 | 2009 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #23 | 1,924 | 1 | 12 | 2003 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #96 | 1,710 | 0 | 19 |
| 30 | 2010 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #29 | 1,887 | 1 | 15 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #72 | 1,627 | 0 | 19 |
| 31 | 2011 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #50 | 1,924 | 1 | 16 | 2005 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #133 | 1,589 | 0 | 19 |
| 32 | 2012 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #213 | 1,794 | 1 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |