H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Juan Ignacio Chela vs Davide Sanguinetti H2H: 0-1
Davide Sanguinetti holds a 1–0 lead over Juan Ignacio Chela in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Davide Sanguinetti leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Davide Sanguinetti won the 2005 Palermo fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 46
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 53
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2005* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Davide Sanguinetti | 6-3 6-4 | Juan Ignacio Chela | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Ignacio Chela | #967 | #15 | 1,510 | 1,909 | 306 | 268 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Davide Sanguinetti | #1,080 | #42 | 874 | 1,771 | 157 | 233 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Ignacio Chela | Davide Sanguinetti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #63 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2004 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #95 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #48 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #65 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #140 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 10–27 | 27.0% | #91 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #73 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #46 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2010 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,737 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #110 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #176 | 1,634 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #107 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #270 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 |