H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Juan Ignacio Chela vs Tobias Kamke H2H: 0-1

Tobias Kamke holds a 1–0 lead over Juan Ignacio Chela in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tobias Kamke leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tobias Kamke won the 2011 Hamburg Open second round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Juan Ignacio Chela
ARG Age 47 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Tobias Kamke
GER Age 40 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tobias Kamke #90 6-1 6-4 Juan Ignacio Chela #21 Match data Jul 21, 2011* R32 Hamburg Open ATP 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Juan Ignacio Chela #967 #15 1,510 1,908 307 270 53.2% 0 0 0 2 4 6
Tobias Kamke #1,114 #64 744 1,766 62 101 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Juan Ignacio Chela Tobias Kamke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1999 0–3 0.0% #124 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2000 14–16 46.7% #63 1,558 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2001 10–10 50.0% #70 1,601 0 1 2007 0–1 0.0% #210 1,502 0 0
22 2002 44–27 62.0% #23 1,782 0 2 2008 0–1 0.0% #243 1,508 0 0
23 2003 35–27 56.5% #38 1,762 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 2004 33–26 55.9% #26 1,718 0 3 2010 7–8 46.7% #67 1,639 0 0
25 2005 28–26 51.9% #39 1,690 0 3 2011 15–23 39.5% #96 1,738 0 0
26 2006 27–26 50.9% #33 1,722 0 3 2012 6–18 25.0% #98 1,628 0 0
27 2007 39–23 62.9% #20 1,795 0 4 2013 17–21 44.7% #74 1,731 0 0
28 2008 11–12 47.8% #140 1,737 0 4 2014 9–16 36.0% #97 1,669 0 0
29 2009 9–14 39.1% #73 1,731 0 4 2015 1–5 16.7% #277 1,583 0 0
30 2010 28–24 53.8% #38 1,837 0 6 2016 5–5 50.0% #118 1,707 0 0
31 2011 24–24 50.0% #29 1,737 0 6 2017 2–2 50.0% #233 1,617 0 0
32 2012 5–12 29.4% #176 1,633 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — 2019 0–1 0.0% #242 1,566 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Juan Ignacio Chela Tobias Kamke
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 1 6 7 14.3% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 2 5 7 28.6% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2002 24 14 38 63.2% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2003 20 14 34 58.8% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2004 12 12 24 50.0% 20 11 31 64.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2010 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 2005 20 14 34 58.8% 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 7 14 21 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — —
26 2006 10 11 21 47.6% 15 12 27 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2012 5 11 16 31.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2007 17 11 28 60.7% 21 10 31 67.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 10 11 21 47.6% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2008 2 4 6 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — — 2014 4 10 14 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — — — — — 2015 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2010 7 11 18 38.9% 21 12 33 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2011 4 10 14 28.6% 19 13 32 59.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
32 2012 2 4 6 33.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 122 120 242 50.4% 179 131 310 57.7% 4 11 15 26.7% 2 8 10 20.0% — 35 61 96 36.5% 16 27 43 37.2% 11 13 24 45.8% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 447/453 of Juan Ignacio Chela's and 163/163 of Tobias Kamke's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Juan Ignacio Chela Tobias Kamke
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/1 0.0 6.0 47.2% 56.0% 35.7% 16.7% — 45.3% 17.6%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 3.0 11.0 58.3% 64.9% 45.3% 25.0% 33.3% 56.7% 30.1%
23 2003 58/62 4.0 4.4 58.8% 69.7% 47.9% 54.8% 45.2% 60.5% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2004 58/59 2.8 2.4 65.3% 66.8% 49.9% 53.6% 46.0% 60.9% 42.5% 2010 15/15 1.8 3.3 59.0% 65.8% 48.0% 56.5% 35.6% 58.8% 39.1%
25 2005 54/54 3.1 2.5 62.6% 68.2% 50.1% 56.5% 43.2% 61.3% 39.8% 2011 38/38 2.3 3.5 57.2% 65.9% 50.9% 55.5% 39.3% 59.5% 38.5%
26 2006 53/53 2.6 1.9 60.4% 69.2% 52.7% 63.5% 44.0% 62.5% 39.4% 2012 24/24 1.4 4.6 57.4% 61.6% 45.8% 47.2% 39.2% 54.8% 40.4%
27 2007 62/62 2.8 3.4 58.0% 69.7% 51.5% 54.4% 43.9% 62.2% 40.8% 2013 38/38 2.2 2.6 60.4% 66.9% 49.5% 60.7% 46.9% 60.0% 39.2%
28 2008 23/23 1.6 4.0 58.1% 62.8% 49.0% 56.5% 48.6% 56.9% 38.6% 2014 25/25 2.4 3.3 61.0% 66.2% 51.7% 60.8% 36.4% 60.4% 34.6%
29 2009 23/23 1.8 3.1 61.8% 66.1% 45.1% 61.1% 39.4% 58.1% 40.6% 2015 6/6 2.2 2.5 56.5% 61.9% 46.0% 38.6% 45.4% 54.5% 37.5%
30 2010 51/52 1.9 2.0 61.6% 65.8% 53.2% 54.6% 51.9% 60.9% 42.5% 2016 10/10 1.0 3.1 61.2% 64.4% 50.3% 45.7% 44.5% 58.8% 39.3%
31 2011 48/48 1.9 2.4 65.4% 65.6% 50.5% 58.7% 47.1% 60.3% 41.6% 2017 4/4 2.3 3.5 57.0% 73.4% 51.3% 60.9% 58.5% 64.2% 39.7%
32 2012 17/17 2.1 2.4 65.3% 61.8% 49.9% 56.0% 40.5% 57.6% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 1/1 0.0 8.0 46.4% 66.7% 44.1% 60.0% 33.3% 54.5% 29.6%
Career — 447/577 2.6 2.8 61.6% 67.4% 50.4% 56.7% 45.4% 60.7% 40.8% — 163/163 2.0 3.4 58.8% 65.4% 49.3% 54.9% 41.0% 58.7% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Juan Ignacio Chela Tobias Kamke
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1999 1464 96.2 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.28 0–1 — — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 1559 133.5 — — — — -63 +120 — 44.9% -0.28 7–4 (64%) 6–7 (46%) 105.5 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 1602 129.7 — — — — -95 +120 — 56.9% +0.49 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 94.4 +1.29 2007 1502 102.7 +1.52 -1.81 0.323 34.5% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.07
22 2002 1783 151.5 — — — — -32 +59 — 56.5% +0.48 18–8 (69%) 18–14 (56%) 109.2 -1.32 2008 1509 105.8 +1.11 -1.95 0.695 44.2% — — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.07
23 2003 1762 142.3 -1.02 +3.12 1.035 50.6% -22 +63 — 54.2% +0.28 11–8 (58%) 14–7 (67%) 104.3 -0.30 2009 1457 96.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2004 1718 148.1 -1.13 +4.91 1.089 51.6% -9 +123 — 53.9% +0.42 11–10 (52%) 5–11 (31%) 95.4 -1.39 2010 1639 126.8 -1.68 +1.56 0.949 48.8% -130 -61 +94 46.3% -0.29 1–1 0–1 — -0.29
25 2005 1691 142.8 -0.78 +2.25 1.029 50.3% +64 +15 — 51.9% +0.01 7–8 (47%) 12–10 (55%) 100.7 +0.41 2011 1738 134.7 -2.56 +1.09 0.951 49.1% -78 -127 +18 42.4% -0.27 1–8 (11%) 3–9 (25%) 89.6 +0.04
26 2006 1723 142.8 +0.65 +1.91 1.053 50.9% +36 +10 — 50.4% -0.03 6–11 (35%) 6–11 (35%) 91.5 -0.31 2012 1629 130.3 -5.44 +2.38 0.893 47.6% -3 -69 — 33.9% -1.11 1–6 (14%) 1–4 (20%) 91.7 -0.37
27 2007 1796 148.8 -0.41 +3.45 1.078 51.3% +38 +27 -340 56.3% +0.40 15–5 (75%) 8–10 (44%) 107.2 +2.42 2013 1731 143.6 -2.58 +2.05 0.978 50.0% +2 -95 -37 48.9% +0.08 4–6 (40%) 6–3 (67%) 102.2 -0.29
28 2008 1738 127.4 -3.84 +1.12 0.895 47.8% +27 +71 — 41.1% -0.75 6–2 (75%) 2–5 (29%) 100.1 +0.48 2014 1669 132.2 -3.08 -1.17 0.873 48.0% -24 -5 +60 42.6% -0.69 3–7 (30%) 6–5 (55%) 99.9 +0.69
29 2009 1732 139.8 -3.44 +1.91 0.970 49.2% -13 +55 — 43.1% -0.12 5–6 (45%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 -0.53 2015 1583 117.3 -3.20 +0.43 0.825 46.0% -7 — — 25.0% -1.69 1–1 1–1 — -0.03
30 2010 1838 147.5 -1.66 +4.86 1.088 51.7% -116 +93 — 51.2% +0.38 9–7 (56%) 8–12 (40%) 98.7 -0.78 2016 1707 126.4 -2.95 +1.32 0.953 49.2% -8 — — 47.8% -0.17 1–0 3–3 (50%) — +0.76
31 2011 1738 144.8 -2.16 +3.38 1.047 50.9% -88 +162 — 50.0% +0.18 9–10 (47%) 5–7 (42%) 95.7 +2.14 2017 1618 113.4 +0.68 +0.45 1.108 51.9% — — +97 55.6% +0.33 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.10
32 2012 1634 126.2 -2.43 +0.71 0.923 48.4% +23 +118 — 42.9% -0.67 1–8 (11%) 4–2 (67%) 92.8 +1.58 2018 1543 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1567 110.3 -0.77 -0.97 0.651 42.8% — — — 25.0% -2.25 — — — -0.04
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1532 92.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1492 104.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1515 104.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1909 149.6 -1.24 +3.12 1.040 50.7% -9 +79 -340 51.6% +0.16 107–94 (53%) 92–103 (47%) 98.2 +0.62 — 1766 131.0 -2.90 +1.13 0.926 48.7% -32 -76 +38 42.4% -0.48 12–30 (29%) 21–28 (43%) 91.3 +0.26

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.