H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Juan Ignacio Londero vs Henri Laaksonen H2H: 0-1
Henri Laaksonen holds a 1–0 lead over Juan Ignacio Londero in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Henri Laaksonen leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Henri Laaksonen won the 2018 Bastad third round 6-3 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 32
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2018* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Henri Laaksonen | 6-3 4-6 7-5 | Juan Ignacio Londero | Match data |
| Jul 16, 2018 | Bastad | ATP 250 | Q2 | Clay | Juan Ignacio Londero | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Henri Laaksonen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Ignacio Londero | #1,011 | #50 | 1,017 | 1,810 | 34 | 49 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Henri Laaksonen | #1,622 | #84 | 798 | 1,830 | 37 | 64 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Ignacio Londero | Henri Laaksonen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #278 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #244 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #318 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #50 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #104 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #276 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #98 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #172 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |