H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Juan Martin del Potro vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 4-1

Juan Martin del Potro holds a 4–1 lead over Jurgen Melzer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Juan Martin del Potro leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jurgen Melzer won the 2009 Shanghai Masters third round 7-5 2-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Juan Martin del Potro
ARG Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Jurgen Melzer
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 14, 2009* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Jurgen Melzer #43 7-5 2-1 (ret.) Juan Martin del Potro #5 Match data
Sep 3, 2009* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Juan Martin del Potro #6 7-6(6) 6-3 6-3 Jurgen Melzer #38 Match data
Mar 17, 2009* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Juan Martin del Potro #6 6-2 2-6 7-6(2) Jurgen Melzer #31 Match data
Jul 20, 2008* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 F Clay Juan Martin del Potro #44 6-2 6-1 Jurgen Melzer #66 Match data
Aug 30, 2007* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Juan Martin del Potro #57 6-3 6-1 6-4 Jurgen Melzer #33 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Juan Martin del Potro #761 #3 6,825 2,273 416 172 70.7% 1 1 0 9 11 22
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,024 326 303 51.8% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Juan Martin del Potro Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 10–12 45.5% #92 1,634 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2007 26–24 52.0% #44 1,785 0 0 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 2008 44–16 73.3% #9 1,975 0 4 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 2009 51–16 76.1% #5 2,198 1 7 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 2010 3–3 50.0% #258 2,117 1 7 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,659 0 0
22 2011 46–17 73.0% #11 2,042 1 9 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,584 0 0
23 2012 57–16 78.1% #7 2,212 1 13 2004 27–22 55.1% #39 1,769 0 0
24 2013 52–16 76.5% #5 2,210 1 17 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 2014 7–3 70.0% #137 2,139 1 18 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,780 0 1
26 2015 2–2 50.0% #590 2,093 1 18 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,695 0 1
27 2016 24–11 68.6% #38 2,115 1 19 2008 26–23 53.1% #34 1,778 0 1
28 2017 38–17 69.1% #11 2,160 1 20 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,924 0 2
29 2018 48–13 78.7% #5 2,190 1 22 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,998 0 3
30 2019 8–5 61.5% #122 2,096 1 22 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,799 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2012 18–22 45.0% #29 1,758 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,825 0 5
33 2022 0–1 0.0% #761 2,066 1 22 2014 12–19 38.7% #113 1,758 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,770 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 — — — — — — — 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,703 0 5