H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Juan Monaco vs Filippo Volandri H2H: 2-1
Juan Monaco holds a 2–1 lead over Filippo Volandri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Juan Monaco leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Juan Monaco won the 2012 Buenos Aires third round 6-1 3-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2012* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Juan Monaco | 6-1 3-1 (ret.) | Filippo Volandri | Match data |
| May 13, 2008* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Juan Monaco | 6-1 4-0 (ret.) | Filippo Volandri | Match data |
| Oct 2, 2004* | Palermo | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Filippo Volandri | 6-1 6-4 | Juan Monaco | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Monaco | #226 | #10 | 2,775 | 2,046 | 319 | 256 | 55.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Filippo Volandri | #1,074 | #25 | 1,140 | 1,840 | 167 | 215 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Monaco | Filippo Volandri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #73 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #43 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2007 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #23 | 1,864 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2008 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #46 | 1,768 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #38 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2009 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,850 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #40 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2010 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,529 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2011 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #26 | 1,932 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,562 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2012 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #12 | 1,944 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,610 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2013 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #69 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2014 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #62 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #88 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2015 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #53 | 1,811 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #71 | 1,604 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2016 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,864 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 1–16 | 5.9% | #212 | 1,477 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,805 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 |