H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Juan Monaco vs Henri Laaksonen H2H: 1-0

Juan Monaco holds a 1–0 lead over Henri Laaksonen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Juan Monaco leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Juan Monaco won the 2013 Swedish Open second round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Juan Monaco
ARG Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Henri Laaksonen
SUI Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Juan Monaco #20 6-4 6-2 Henri Laaksonen #216 Match data Jul 12, 2013* R16 Swedish Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Juan Monaco #226 #10 2,775 2,052 327 260 55.7% 0 0 0 2 7 9
Henri Laaksonen #1,622 #84 798 1,836 37 64 36.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Juan Monaco Henri Laaksonen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2004 16–12 57.1% #73 1,661 0 0 2012 0–2 0.0% #291 1,506 0 0
21 2005 18–25 41.9% #85 1,577 0 0 2013 2–4 33.3% #244 1,601 0 0
22 2006 18–23 43.9% #69 1,639 0 0 2014 1–3 25.0% #318 1,559 0 0
23 2007 41–19 68.3% #23 1,864 0 3 2015 0–2 0.0% #181 1,554 0 0
24 2008 27–21 56.2% #46 1,760 0 3 2016 2–4 33.3% #136 1,594 0 0
25 2009 34–24 58.6% #30 1,851 0 3 2017 10–10 50.0% #121 1,691 0 0
26 2010 28–18 60.9% #26 1,837 0 3 2018 5–4 55.6% #169 1,643 0 0
27 2011 26–24 52.0% #26 1,940 0 3 2019 6–8 42.9% #104 1,654 0 0
28 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,935 0 7 2020 1–5 16.7% #134 1,659 0 0
29 2013 22–21 51.2% #42 1,822 0 8 2021 7–8 46.7% #98 1,796 0 0
30 2014 22–19 53.7% #62 1,864 0 8 2022 3–14 17.6% #172 1,544 0 0
31 2015 21–19 52.5% #53 1,812 0 8 — — — — — — —
32 2016 17–14 54.8% #65 1,875 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 2017 0–3 0.0% #226 1,814 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Juan Monaco Henri Laaksonen
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2004 2 3 5 40.0% 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2005 1 8 9 11.1% 14 14 28 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2006 3 8 11 27.3% 15 15 30 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 2007 12 9 21 57.1% 28 8 36 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2008 9 10 19 47.4% 18 10 28 64.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
25 2009 7 10 17 41.2% 27 13 40 67.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 7 7 14 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2010 14 10 24 58.3% 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — — — — — 2018 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
27 2011 15 12 27 55.6% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2019 3 4 7 42.9% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
28 2012 12 10 22 54.5% 22 6 28 78.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2020 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2013 2 7 9 22.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2021 3 4 7 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2014 7 7 14 50.0% 15 12 27 55.6% — — — — — — — — 2022 2 9 11 18.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2015 6 5 11 54.5% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 6 7 13 46.2% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 96 108 204 47.1% 220 136 356 61.8% 7 11 18 38.9% 4 5 9 44.4% — 18 35 53 34.0% 19 27 46 41.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 578/587 of Juan Monaco's and 100/101 of Henri Laaksonen's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Juan Monaco Henri Laaksonen
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2004 28/28 1.9 2.5 66.9% 63.4% 48.9% 47.3% 47.8% 58.5% 41.8% 2012 2/2 6.5 5.0 42.4% 71.6% 36.6% 53.2% 25.0% 50.7% 29.3%
21 2005 42/43 2.0 2.1 65.5% 63.7% 50.7% 51.2% 43.6% 58.9% 37.4% 2013 6/6 3.2 3.8 57.3% 63.3% 51.5% 46.3% 47.3% 58.4% 36.0%
22 2006 41/41 1.9 1.8 64.0% 65.6% 52.2% 56.6% 40.4% 60.9% 40.3% 2014 4/4 2.0 8.5 63.3% 67.5% 39.4% 58.3% 39.3% 57.4% 40.4%
23 2007 60/60 3.2 1.9 65.2% 69.0% 56.6% 57.3% 50.6% 64.7% 41.1% 2015 2/2 2.5 4.5 53.4% 62.3% 43.6% 61.2% 27.8% 53.5% 34.3%
24 2008 46/48 2.7 1.9 64.8% 65.5% 51.6% 50.7% 43.9% 60.1% 41.8% 2016 6/6 3.3 3.5 55.3% 69.7% 52.1% 43.4% 41.7% 61.8% 37.0%
25 2009 58/58 1.9 2.0 68.0% 66.6% 53.2% 52.0% 48.6% 62.4% 42.9% 2017 20/20 7.7 5.4 59.5% 73.5% 46.6% 56.6% 40.6% 62.7% 36.5%
26 2010 46/46 3.4 2.5 65.3% 68.0% 52.0% 58.2% 45.8% 62.4% 40.7% 2018 9/9 4.4 3.9 61.8% 68.2% 53.9% 63.8% 53.0% 61.1% 39.9%
27 2011 49/50 2.0 1.9 66.1% 66.1% 52.9% 57.1% 46.6% 61.4% 40.7% 2019 14/14 6.4 3.4 57.0% 69.0% 50.3% 55.4% 33.4% 60.9% 36.0%
28 2012 53/55 1.7 2.0 67.7% 67.4% 52.8% 55.8% 45.5% 62.4% 43.2% 2020 6/6 5.7 2.2 59.3% 71.1% 43.7% 47.4% 39.6% 60.2% 33.5%
29 2013 43/43 2.0 1.9 69.0% 65.2% 52.2% 50.8% 49.4% 61.4% 42.4% 2021 14/15 7.2 3.1 54.9% 72.9% 48.9% 52.7% 42.6% 62.4% 36.9%
30 2014 41/41 1.9 1.6 69.8% 64.7% 54.8% 49.0% 45.9% 61.7% 41.1% 2022 17/17 4.4 2.4 57.0% 64.3% 44.8% 51.6% 26.2% 56.2% 30.8%
31 2015 40/40 2.2 1.4 71.9% 64.4% 51.7% 59.5% 41.9% 60.6% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 28/31 1.9 1.1 74.5% 64.0% 55.4% 54.8% 39.6% 61.4% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 3/3 0.7 0.7 63.6% 60.5% 47.8% 52.2% 59.5% 55.8% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Juan Monaco Henri Laaksonen
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1499 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1662 138.6 -2.03 +3.31 1.009 50.1% -131 +91 — 51.5% +0.16 6–3 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 105.7 -0.82 2012 1506 107.9 -2.65 -1.33 0.595 41.6% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.15
21 2005 1577 124.6 -2.76 -0.23 0.912 48.2% -97 +112 — 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 5–9 (36%) 94.3 +0.19 2013 1601 120.9 -0.84 -1.22 0.865 47.2% — +81 — 28.6% -0.57 2–0 0–2 — +0.11
22 2006 1640 125.6 -0.75 +2.74 1.032 50.5% -158 +76 — 46.7% -0.17 3–8 (27%) 5–6 (45%) 94.7 -1.40 2014 1559 114.0 -2.21 -0.70 0.949 48.9% — +71 — 40.0% -0.30 0–2 2–1 (67%) — +0.57
23 2007 1865 145.9 +1.71 +3.90 1.166 52.7% -172 +120 — 60.6% +0.84 16–6 (73%) 7–12 (37%) 106.6 +0.58 2015 1555 105.9 -0.83 -2.10 0.738 44.3% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.13
24 2008 1760 137.9 -2.43 +3.95 1.049 50.9% -60 +159 — 55.5% +0.11 7–7 (50%) 9–6 (60%) 98.3 +1.07 2016 1594 113.4 -1.15 -0.44 0.968 48.8% +5 +32 — 25.0% -1.67 1–1 1–0 — +0.16
25 2009 1852 157.8 -0.30 +5.86 1.140 52.3% -132 +156 — 57.5% +0.53 6–8 (43%) 7–8 (47%) 96.0 -2.94 2017 1691 136.9 -0.97 +0.26 0.980 49.9% +2 -37 — 48.1% -0.06 5–4 (56%) 4–6 (40%) 104.1 +0.07
26 2010 1838 151.8 -0.23 +3.49 1.081 51.6% -17 +79 — 58.8% +0.54 9–8 (53%) 12–6 (67%) 104.1 +2.65 2018 1644 113.9 -2.10 +2.55 1.026 50.7% — +53 — 52.4% +0.29 2–1 (67%) — — +0.03
27 2011 1940 155.8 -0.55 +4.02 1.054 50.7% +9 -75 — 51.3% +0.12 7–9 (44%) 8–9 (47%) 99.2 -0.04 2019 1655 122.8 -1.52 +0.53 0.920 48.5% -41 +57 — 43.6% -0.69 1–1 6–3 (67%) — +0.45
28 2012 1936 158.3 -0.31 +5.86 1.150 52.6% -29 +125 -371 62.2% +0.75 12–7 (63%) 11–7 (61%) 106.1 +2.18 2020 1659 122.4 -2.11 -1.75 0.841 46.8% -44 — — 29.4% -1.29 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.21
29 2013 1822 149.5 -1.37 +4.76 1.098 51.6% -49 +142 -201 54.3% +0.49 4–10 (29%) 5–10 (33%) 86.9 +2.05 2021 1796 124.5 -0.16 -0.41 0.980 49.6% -116 +77 — 52.5% +0.20 2–2 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 102.7 -0.27
30 2014 1864 149.5 -1.50 +3.48 1.073 51.0% -49 +48 — 52.9% +0.15 7–9 (44%) 9–9 (50%) 97.7 +0.07 2022 1545 111.8 -4.15 -4.45 0.704 44.1% +47 +124 — 19.5% -2.15 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 98.2 +0.06
31 2015 1813 155.6 -2.84 +3.06 1.012 50.2% +34 +69 -157 51.0% +0.17 7–6 (54%) 3–11 (21%) 95.2 -0.21 2023 1507 96.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 1875 154.8 -1.63 +3.93 1.056 50.7% -44 +70 — 52.2% +0.15 4–1 (80%) 4–6 (40%) 102.4 -1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 1814 105.4 -2.73 -1.34 0.827 45.7% — — — 14.3% -2.00 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2053 154.7 -0.99 +3.80 1.069 51.1% -64 +97 -261 54.1% +0.29 92–89 (51%) 90–105 (46%) 96.3 +0.33 — 1836 124.9 -1.73 -0.76 0.892 48.0% -16 +59 — 38.8% -0.71 15–17 (47%) 22–19 (54%) 105.4 +0.69

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.