H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Juan Monaco vs Joachim Johansson H2H: 1-2
Joachim Johansson holds a 2–1 lead over Juan Monaco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Joachim Johansson leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Joachim Johansson won the 2009 Stockholm fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 44
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2009* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Joachim Johansson | 6-4 6-4 | Juan Monaco | Match data |
| Oct 7, 2004* | Lyon | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Joachim Johansson | 6-4 6-3 | Juan Monaco | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2004* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Juan Monaco | 7-6(6) 6-2 | Joachim Johansson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Monaco | #226 | #10 | 2,775 | 2,046 | 319 | 256 | 55.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Joachim Johansson | #705 | #9 | 1,980 | 1,942 | 69 | 53 | 56.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Monaco | Joachim Johansson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #773 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #390 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #73 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #11 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2006 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2007 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #23 | 1,864 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #193 | 1,781 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2008 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #46 | 1,768 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #350 | 1,736 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2009 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,850 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #771 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2010 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #365 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2011 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #26 | 1,932 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2012 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #12 | 1,944 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2014 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #62 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #694 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2015 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #53 | 1,811 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2016 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,864 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,805 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |