H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Juan Monaco vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 7-1

Juan Monaco holds a 7–1 lead over Jurgen Melzer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Juan Monaco leads 5–0 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Monaco won the 2014 Madrid Masters second round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Juan Monaco
ARG Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
7 – 1
8 main draw meetings
Jurgen Melzer
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 6, 2014* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Juan Monaco #56 6-4 6-3 Jurgen Melzer #64 Match data
Aug 13, 2013* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Juan Monaco #32 6-3 6-2 Jurgen Melzer #33 Match data
Oct 16, 2010* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Juan Monaco #41 6-7(6) 7-5 6-2 Jurgen Melzer #12 Match data
Oct 7, 2010* Tokyo ATP 500 R32 Hard Jurgen Melzer #13 6-4 4-6 6-1 Juan Monaco #35 Match data
May 31, 2007* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Juan Monaco #35 6-2 6-3 6-2 Jurgen Melzer #30 Match data
May 23, 2007* Poertschach ATP 250 R32 Clay Juan Monaco #47 6-3 6-1 Jurgen Melzer #30 Match data
Aug 3, 2006* Sopot ATP 250 R32 Clay Juan Monaco #72 2-6 7-6(2) 6-4 Jurgen Melzer #73 Match data
Jul 21, 2006* Stuttgart ATP 250 R16 Clay Juan Monaco #88 6-4 6-7(3) 6-4 Jurgen Melzer #83 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Juan Monaco #226 #10 2,775 2,046 319 256 55.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,024 326 303 51.8% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Juan Monaco Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 2004 16–12 57.1% #73 1,661 0 0 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 2005 18–25 41.9% #85 1,587 0 0 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,659 0 0
22 2006 18–23 43.9% #69 1,641 0 0 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,584 0 0
23 2007 41–19 68.3% #23 1,864 0 3 2004 27–22 55.1% #39 1,769 0 0
24 2008 27–20 57.4% #46 1,768 0 3 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 2009 34–24 58.6% #30 1,850 0 3 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,780 0 1
26 2010 28–18 60.9% #26 1,838 0 3 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,695 0 1
27 2011 26–24 52.0% #26 1,932 0 3 2008 26–23 53.1% #34 1,778 0 1
28 2012 36–17 67.9% #12 1,944 0 7 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,924 0 2
29 2013 18–21 46.2% #42 1,809 0 7 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,998 0 3
30 2014 20–18 52.6% #62 1,856 0 7 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,799 0 3
31 2015 21–19 52.5% #53 1,811 0 7 2012 18–22 45.0% #29 1,758 0 4
32 2016 16–13 55.2% #65 1,864 0 8 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,825 0 5
33 2017 0–3 0.0% #226 1,805 0 8 2014 12–19 38.7% #113 1,758 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,770 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 — — — — — — — 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,703 0 5