H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Juan Monaco vs Pere Riba H2H: 2-0
Juan Monaco holds a 2–0 lead over Pere Riba in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Juan Monaco leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Juan Monaco won the 2014 Hamburg second round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2014* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Juan Monaco | 6-3 6-1 | Pere Riba | Match data |
| Sep 25, 2009* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Juan Monaco | 6-4 6-2 | Pere Riba | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Monaco | #226 | #10 | 2,775 | 2,046 | 319 | 256 | 55.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Pere Riba | #1,502 | #65 | 761 | 1,731 | 24 | 63 | 27.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Monaco | Pere Riba | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #272 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #73 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #121 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #72 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #23 | 1,864 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #89 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #46 | 1,768 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,850 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #126 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #114 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #26 | 1,932 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #219 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #12 | 1,944 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2014 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #62 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #53 | 1,811 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2016 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,864 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,805 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |