H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Julien Benneteau vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 1-0

Julien Benneteau holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julien Benneteau leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julien Benneteau won the 2011 Miami Open first round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Julien Benneteau
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julien Benneteau #81 6-4 6-3 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #61 Match data Mar 25, 2011* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Julien Benneteau #140 #25 1,608 1,959 270 293 48.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Julien Benneteau Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 2001 1–1 50.0% #271 1,495 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 2002 0–2 0.0% #253 1,452 0 0 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 2003 3–7 30.0% #138 1,548 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2004 14–15 48.3% #65 1,637 0 0 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2005 5–18 21.7% #165 1,535 0 0 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 2006 24–22 52.2% #40 1,707 0 0 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 2007 22–28 44.0% #68 1,672 0 0 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2008 22–20 52.4% #43 1,786 0 0 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2009 26–28 48.1% #46 1,794 0 0 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2010 24–19 55.8% #44 1,854 0 0 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 2011 21–21 50.0% #52 1,872 0 0 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 2012 27–22 55.1% #35 1,883 0 0 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 2013 27–25 51.9% #35 1,863 0 0 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 2014 25–22 53.2% #25 1,895 0 0 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0
33 2015 1–5 16.7% #527 1,800 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2016 7–14 33.3% #130 1,806 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2017 13–13 50.0% #56 1,863 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2018 8–11 42.1% #140 1,806 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Julien Benneteau Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2001 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2002 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
21 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 5 8 13 38.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2005 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 2006 14 12 26 53.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2007 13 18 31 41.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2008 10 13 23 43.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2009 16 16 32 50.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
28 2010 14 11 25 56.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 2011 13 10 23 56.5% 4 8 12 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
30 2012 19 15 34 55.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2013 21 17 38 55.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2014 22 16 38 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 6 10 16 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 174 178 352 49.4% 46 63 109 42.2% 36 40 76 47.4% 14 12 26 53.8% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 556/561 of Julien Benneteau's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Julien Benneteau Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 2001 1/2 5.0 1.0 52.4% 60.5% 41.0% 53.8% 50.0% 51.2% 39.4% 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
21 2003 10/10 2.7 2.8 63.9% 60.1% 47.6% 47.1% 29.1% 55.7% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 29/29 3.9 3.3 62.3% 68.8% 48.6% 55.1% 39.6% 61.2% 36.9% 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 2005 23/23 3.7 2.8 64.2% 64.0% 42.8% 58.6% 39.5% 56.5% 36.3% 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 2006 46/46 5.4 3.1 67.2% 66.8% 48.4% 59.4% 38.9% 60.6% 37.6% 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2007 50/50 4.3 3.1 64.6% 66.5% 52.5% 54.8% 38.9% 61.5% 37.2% 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 2008 41/42 4.3 3.3 64.1% 70.0% 50.6% 57.6% 37.4% 63.1% 37.9% 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 2009 54/54 5.6 3.2 66.0% 69.9% 48.7% 56.9% 39.1% 62.7% 36.7% 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2010 43/43 7.0 3.7 65.7% 69.6% 47.9% 56.5% 40.0% 62.0% 36.4% 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 2011 42/42 5.8 3.3 64.0% 71.8% 50.8% 58.7% 39.8% 64.2% 36.3% 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 2012 47/49 6.9 4.0 65.7% 71.0% 50.4% 55.1% 46.8% 63.8% 38.1% 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 2013 51/52 6.2 2.9 63.4% 70.0% 50.3% 50.8% 38.5% 62.8% 38.0% 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 2014 47/47 7.6 2.9 64.6% 73.1% 50.9% 62.1% 40.7% 65.0% 35.9% 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
33 2015 6/6 6.0 1.7 66.0% 71.8% 53.6% 22.8% 34.0% 65.3% 27.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 21/21 7.9 3.0 62.1% 69.6% 53.4% 59.6% 33.2% 63.2% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 26/26 7.4 4.2 60.4% 75.3% 49.6% 57.6% 38.0% 65.3% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 19/19 10.1 6.0 58.3% 70.2% 45.7% 58.1% 37.7% 59.9% 34.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 556/563 5.9 3.4 64.3% 69.6% 49.6% 56.4% 39.3% 62.4% 36.7% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Julien Benneteau Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1498 100.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 2001 1495 107.8 -2.66 +3.68 0.808 45.8% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — +0.23 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 2002 1452 94.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.80 — — — -0.09 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 2003 1548 113.3 -3.92 -1.10 0.798 45.3% +23 -61 — 26.9% -1.73 2–0 2–0 — -0.28 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 1638 129.1 -1.57 +1.46 0.952 48.9% +6 -44 -85 48.6% -0.22 3–4 (43%) 1–7 (13%) 95.9 -0.41 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20
23 2005 1536 119.2 -3.91 -0.41 0.835 46.9% +40 +10 -13 27.8% -1.39 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 92.2 -0.33 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24
24 2006 1707 133.9 -1.05 +0.70 0.955 49.2% +20 -94 -191 47.5% -0.30 10–5 (67%) 13–11 (54%) 108.1 +0.54 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95
25 2007 1673 130.1 -1.22 +0.55 0.965 49.2% -11 -88 -162 46.0% -0.36 7–10 (41%) 11–8 (58%) 99.7 +1.04 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72
26 2008 1787 143.1 +0.15 +2.10 1.026 50.2% -39 -21 -283 48.6% -0.27 7–7 (50%) 8–3 (73%) 105.9 -3.04 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11
27 2009 1794 145.6 -0.39 +0.68 0.985 49.7% +29 -82 -256 46.5% -0.08 15–11 (58%) 8–13 (38%) 101.6 -0.56 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22
28 2010 1854 142.2 -1.47 +0.40 0.958 49.2% -5 -172 -138 53.2% -0.07 8–5 (62%) 14–6 (70%) 107.8 -0.34 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44
29 2011 1872 143.5 +0.78 -0.62 1.014 50.1% +21 -182 -112 48.6% +0.05 8–8 (50%) 9–8 (53%) 99.4 -0.79 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04
30 2012 1884 153.7 +0.89 +1.57 1.053 51.0% -17 -159 -45 58.5% +0.32 6–12 (33%) 13–11 (54%) 95.5 -0.52 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22
31 2013 1863 155.8 -0.38 +1.63 1.020 50.1% +13 -119 -42 52.3% +0.05 3–10 (23%) 14–10 (58%) 95.0 -0.69 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 2014 1895 157.3 +1.28 +0.40 1.026 50.6% +48 -215 -117 52.1% +0.21 9–9 (50%) 6–14 (30%) 93.2 +1.35 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 2015 1800 109.3 -0.93 -2.34 0.783 45.6% +20 — — 25.0% -1.50 — 1–1 — +0.34 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1806 142.3 -0.03 -1.08 0.950 48.8% -5 — -45 39.7% -0.60 3–4 (43%) 3–6 (33%) 97.5 -0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1863 143.0 +1.12 +0.87 1.046 50.7% +23 — -101 50.8% +0.16 4–5 (44%) 4–6 (40%) 99.1 -0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1807 131.6 -2.07 -0.63 0.869 47.5% -15 -176 +4 45.6% -0.58 1–2 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 101.1 -0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1960 148.1 -0.48 +0.63 0.977 49.5% +9 -103 -115 48.0% -0.19 86–96 (47%) 114–111 (51%) 99.8 -1.11 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.