H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Julien Benneteau vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 2-0
Julien Benneteau holds a 2–0 lead over Michal Przysiezny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Julien Benneteau leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julien Benneteau won the 2013 Kuala Lumpur third round 7-6(6) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2013* | Kuala Lumpur | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Julien Benneteau | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2013* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Julien Benneteau | 6-4 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julien Benneteau | #140 | #25 | 1,608 | 1,955 | 269 | 292 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julien Benneteau | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #138 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #65 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #165 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #40 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,871 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #25 | 1,895 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #527 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,862 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #140 | 1,806 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |