H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jurgen Fassbender vs Robert Maud H2H: 1-2
Robert Maud holds a 2–1 lead over Jurgen Fassbender in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Robert Maud leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Jurgen Fassbender leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jurgen Fassbender won the 1968 Munich third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 78
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
RSA
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 1968* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jurgen Fassbender | 6-3 6-4 | Robert Maud | Match data |
| Jan 16, 1968* | Durban 1 | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Robert Maud | 5-7 8-6 6-4 3-6 12-10 | Jurgen Fassbender | Match data |
| Jan 5, 1968* | Cape Town | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Robert Maud | 6-2 5-7 7-5 | Jurgen Fassbender | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jurgen Fassbender | #618 | #31 | 0 | 1,868 | 170 | 167 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Robert Maud | #326 | #57 | 0 | 1,804 | 123 | 131 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jurgen Fassbender | Robert Maud | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1968 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1969 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 29–11 | 72.5% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1970 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,409 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 21–10 | 67.7% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1971 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 23–13 | 63.9% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1972 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 22–31 | 41.5% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1973 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #46 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 6–26 | 18.8% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1974 | 41–30 | 57.7% | #54 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #73 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1975 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #62 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1976 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #93 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #178 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1977 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #64 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1978 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #151 | 1,667 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1979 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #242 | 1,627 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #482 | 1,617 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |