H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jurgen Melzer vs Dmitry Tursunov H2H: 3-3

Jurgen Melzer and Dmitry Tursunov are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Dmitry Tursunov leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jurgen Melzer won the 2013 Winston-Salem Open quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.

AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 3
6 main draw meetings
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jurgen Melzer #32 6-4 6-3 Dmitry Tursunov #35 Match data Aug 23, 2013* QF Winston-Salem Open ATP 250 Hard
Jurgen Melzer #11 6-3 2-6 7-6(5) 7-6(1) Dmitry Tursunov #53 Match data Jun 23, 2011* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Dmitry Tursunov #129 6-4 2-6 6-1 Jurgen Melzer #10 Match data Feb 19, 2011* QF Marseille ATP 250 Hard
Jurgen Melzer #15 6-4 6-2 3-6 4-6 6-2 Dmitry Tursunov #481 Match data Sep 1, 2010* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Dmitry Tursunov #27 7-6(6) 7-6(0) Jurgen Melzer #60 Match data Oct 25, 2007* R32 St. Petersburg International Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Dmitry Tursunov #68 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 Jurgen Melzer #43 Match data Aug 28, 2004* QF Long Island International Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,017 331 307 51.9% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Dmitry Tursunov #815 #20 2,290 1,912 223 217 50.7% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jurgen Melzer Dmitry Tursunov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0 2001 3–1 75.0% #174 1,542 0 0
19 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0 2003 2–3 40.0% #98 1,610 0 0
21 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,660 0 0 2004 12–17 41.4% #80 1,679 0 0
22 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,583 0 0 2005 16–16 50.0% #60 1,741 0 0
23 2004 27–23 54.0% #39 1,759 0 0 2006 42–31 57.5% #22 1,778 0 1
24 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0 2007 28–21 57.1% #34 1,767 0 3
25 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,774 0 1 2008 35–22 61.4% #22 1,859 0 5
26 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,696 0 1 2009 13–17 43.3% #89 1,701 0 6
27 2008 29–24 54.7% #34 1,800 0 1 2010 6–9 40.0% #197 1,715 0 6
28 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,927 0 2 2011 18–18 50.0% #40 1,770 0 7
29 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,985 0 3 2012 3–10 23.1% #122 1,693 0 7
30 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,797 0 3 2013 30–21 58.8% #29 1,868 0 7
31 2012 18–23 43.9% #29 1,755 0 4 2014 13–19 40.6% #110 1,766 0 7
32 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,826 0 5
33 2014 14–20 41.2% #113 1,757 0 5 2016 1–7 12.5% #411 1,689 0 7
34 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5 2017 1–5 16.7% #487 1,632 0 7
35 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,769 0 5
36 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,708 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jurgen Melzer Dmitry Tursunov
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1999 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 3 1 4 75.0%
19 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2001 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 2 3 5 40.0%
21 2002 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2004 8 11 19 42.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2003 2 7 9 22.2% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5%
23 2004 12 12 24 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2006 31 16 47 66.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 2005 10 14 24 41.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 15 11 26 57.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2006 9 11 20 45.0% 20 9 29 69.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 28 14 42 66.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 2007 14 14 28 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 7 14 21 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
27 2008 17 15 32 53.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 2010 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2009 19 15 34 55.9% 12 9 21 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 2011 12 15 27 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
29 2010 28 15 43 65.1% 17 8 25 68.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
30 2011 10 13 23 43.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 2013 24 14 38 63.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2012 14 16 30 46.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2014 5 9 14 35.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0%
32 2013 19 13 32 59.4% 2 8 10 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
33 2014 3 9 12 25.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2016 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 2015 4 6 10 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2017 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
35 2016 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
36 2017 0 1 1 0.0%
37 2018 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 168 168 336 50.0% 120 101 221 54.3% 38 33 71 53.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 151 135 286 52.8% 27 44 71 38.0% 37 30 67 55.2% 8 8 16 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 625/638 of Jurgen Melzer's and 429/440 of Dmitry Tursunov's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jurgen Melzer Dmitry Tursunov
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1999 2/2 5.0 8.5 40.6% 59.2% 42.2% 56.1% 65.6% 49.1% 37.0% 2001 3/4 6.7 4.0 57.0% 76.5% 45.5% 45.6% 18.6% 63.4% 33.6%
19 2000 3/3 6.3 3.0 55.6% 64.6% 51.8% 38.5% 30.3% 59.7% 34.1% —/—
20 2001 1/2 5.0 3.0 59.4% 75.4% 41.0% 60.0% 18.2% 61.5% 38.6% 2003 5/5 12.2 5.8 52.6% 70.3% 45.4% 47.1% 44.7% 58.6% 36.1%
21 2002 18/19 4.9 3.1 58.9% 72.7% 48.0% 53.1% 40.9% 62.5% 36.7% 2004 29/29 6.9 5.0 53.5% 68.2% 50.3% 62.3% 34.5% 59.9% 34.8%
22 2003 29/29 6.7 4.7 56.8% 67.4% 44.1% 58.3% 41.9% 57.1% 34.6% 2005 31/32 9.0 5.7 55.2% 77.7% 46.4% 65.7% 48.7% 63.8% 39.2%
23 2004 49/50 5.2 3.3 58.1% 72.6% 49.1% 63.9% 46.6% 62.8% 38.1% 2006 72/73 8.7 3.8 54.8% 74.5% 50.9% 58.9% 41.5% 63.6% 38.0%
24 2005 49/49 4.4 2.7 59.8% 68.4% 49.9% 58.8% 50.0% 60.8% 36.7% 2007 49/49 8.2 4.0 56.0% 74.9% 54.1% 49.4% 44.9% 65.7% 35.8%
25 2006 57/58 5.7 3.2 60.9% 69.3% 52.3% 62.2% 44.8% 62.5% 39.3% 2008 53/57 8.0 3.2 58.4% 75.1% 51.7% 65.9% 40.8% 65.1% 36.0%
26 2007 44/45 4.7 2.8 63.0% 67.4% 49.9% 58.3% 45.1% 61.2% 36.4% 2009 30/30 6.4 3.3 57.2% 73.8% 51.1% 64.0% 45.2% 64.0% 35.6%
27 2008 49/53 6.6 2.5 61.7% 71.5% 54.4% 57.6% 37.8% 65.0% 35.3% 2010 15/15 5.7 2.4 62.2% 69.5% 55.4% 58.5% 47.7% 64.2% 33.6%
28 2009 61/61 6.8 2.3 59.4% 73.4% 52.3% 58.8% 41.0% 64.9% 37.0% 2011 35/36 6.6 4.1 60.6% 70.5% 49.8% 60.7% 42.6% 62.1% 34.0%
29 2010 72/74 6.3 2.4 61.1% 72.2% 54.7% 59.9% 45.7% 65.3% 37.3% 2012 12/13 6.2 2.7 58.5% 73.9% 46.6% 59.3% 22.0% 62.1% 32.5%
30 2011 41/41 5.0 2.4 62.8% 68.9% 50.9% 51.6% 40.0% 62.1% 38.3% 2013 50/51 7.4 4.6 57.8% 74.3% 50.0% 59.7% 44.2% 63.7% 36.5%
31 2012 40/41 5.0 3.3 61.9% 69.0% 52.4% 52.4% 48.1% 62.4% 34.8% 2014 31/32 5.6 3.1 61.3% 68.8% 50.5% 64.7% 46.4% 61.9% 35.0%
32 2013 48/48 4.5 2.8 65.4% 67.2% 49.9% 56.8% 33.7% 61.1% 35.8% —/—
33 2014 34/34 4.1 2.6 65.4% 67.2% 50.5% 54.5% 36.3% 61.2% 37.0% 2016 8/8 4.8 3.1 60.7% 66.9% 48.4% 60.5% 43.2% 59.5% 31.3%
34 2015 20/20 3.3 4.0 61.0% 67.3% 49.3% 60.5% 41.5% 60.4% 36.2% 2017 6/6 2.0 2.7 65.3% 62.5% 40.5% 54.0% 35.1% 54.9% 30.2%
35 2016 6/6 2.7 2.5 67.4% 66.9% 44.8% 60.6% 51.9% 59.3% 40.5% —/—
36 2017 1/1 4.0 1.0 74.8% 56.6% 53.6% 22.2% 75.0% 55.9% 31.1% —/—
37 2018 1/2 3.0 2.0 79.3% 72.5% 55.6% 100.0% 25.0% 69.0% 27.6% —/—

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jurgen Melzer Dmitry Tursunov
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1999 1518 108.7 -0.28 +0.62 0.727 43.2% 40.0% -1.60 1–0 1–0 -0.03 2001 1543 113.3 -0.56 +1.80 0.919 47.8% +43 66.7% +0.44 1–0 2–0 +0.16
19 2000 1548 113.7 -1.47 -0.74 0.846 47.2% 22.2% -1.22 0–1 0–2 -0.26
20 2001 1551 105.3 +1.50 -1.19 1.001 49.0% 40.0% +0.20 1–0 0–3 (0%) -0.04 2003 1611 120.7 -1.94 +0.40 0.873 47.6% +63 38.9% -0.28 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) -0.16
21 2002 1660 130.8 +0.42 -0.51 0.980 49.6% -48 -49 50.0% -0.07 2–2 (50%) 1–4 (20%) +0.12 2004 1679 122.1 -2.57 -0.92 0.868 47.7% -8 -166 -127 41.8% -0.52 7–5 (58%) 7–7 (50%) -1.08
22 2003 1583 111.1 -3.51 -2.06 0.807 46.5% -20 -56 +87 39.0% -0.66 8–3 (73%) 7–6 (54%) +0.49 2005 1742 140.2 +0.93 +1.97 1.082 51.8% -49 -30 52.9% +0.39 5–9 (36%) 8–7 (53%) -1.22
23 2004 1760 142.0 +0.13 +1.60 1.023 50.6% -26 -102 -105 52.7% +0.22 8–8 (50%) 10–12 (45%) -0.06 2006 1778 142.8 +1.19 +1.27 1.045 50.9% -3 -200 -16 55.3% +0.27 16–17 (48%) 19–13 (59%) +1.38
24 2005 1702 137.8 -0.93 +0.15 0.938 49.4% -35 +36 -24 50.0% -0.11 10–12 (45%) 8–9 (47%) -0.88 2007 1767 135.6 +1.31 -0.47 1.044 50.8% +2 -220 +74 54.5% +0.32 12–9 (57%) 12–7 (63%) +2.65
25 2006 1774 133.3 +0.02 +1.44 1.047 51.0% -104 +59 -110 52.9% +0.07 11–13 (46%) 13–9 (59%) -0.50 2008 1860 147.7 +1.87 +0.11 1.032 50.6% +36 -281 +4 57.0% +0.36 10–3 (77%) 14–11 (56%) -0.15
26 2007 1696 137.3 -1.21 +0.32 0.940 48.9% -11 +74 48.1% -0.22 9–7 (56%) 7–11 (39%) +0.10 2009 1702 134.8 +0.01 -1.06 0.988 50.2% +12 +189 47.9% +0.10 6–5 (55%) 5–10 (33%) +1.41
27 2008 1800 138.7 +1.21 -0.83 1.009 50.0% -22 -35 -116 52.4% +0.11 13–8 (62%) 13–15 (46%) +0.86 2010 1715 128.5 +1.03 -0.62 0.937 49.0% +10 43.6% -0.74 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) -0.47
28 2009 1927 151.7 +1.63 +0.96 1.054 50.8% -29 -86 -117 55.1% +0.14 8–8 (50%) 14–8 (64%) -1.10 2011 1770 139.9 -0.29 -2.16 0.896 48.5% -29 +155 50.0% -0.27 7–5 (58%) 12–9 (57%) -0.69
29 2010 1986 158.2 +2.39 +1.03 1.076 51.1% -20 -6 -97 59.0% +0.57 15–7 (68%) 19–21 (48%) +1.32 2012 1693 121.2 -0.78 -2.26 0.857 47.3% +20 +108 28.1% -1.16 0–1 1–3 (25%) +0.15
30 2011 1797 152.8 -0.17 +0.99 1.011 50.3% +17 +143 +139 52.0% +0.28 4–6 (40%) 6–7 (46%) +1.81 2013 1869 152.8 +0.49 -0.37 1.006 50.7% +24 -219 58.8% +0.44 9–7 (56%) 15–5 (75%) +0.52
31 2012 1755 145.9 -0.78 -0.89 0.925 48.7% +20 +103 +111 44.8% -0.47 9–7 (56%) 13–7 (65%) +1.18 2014 1766 144.7 -1.43 -0.21 0.917 49.1% +26 -36 -10 46.2% -0.08 2–4 (33%) 6–7 (46%) +0.04
32 2013 1827 141.2 -1.23 -0.76 0.919 48.3% +22 -130 +72 47.5% -0.28 10–6 (63%) 8–10 (44%) +2.36 2015 1753 98.9
33 2014 1757 141.1 -1.73 +1.12 0.955 49.1% +3 -5 +127 41.2% -0.46 6–7 (46%) 7–10 (41%) -1.34 2016 1690 111.7 -2.62 -1.37 0.772 46.5% +48 25.0% -1.55 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) -0.60
34 2015 1750 127.3 -2.36 -0.42 0.914 48.8% +47 -54 44.7% -0.40 1–1 5–8 (38%) -0.22 2017 1633 107.5 -2.99 -2.95 0.668 42.8% +52 15.4% -2.46 1–0 0–2 +0.09
35 2016 1770 130.7 -0.27 +1.24 0.995 50.5% +16 -37 60.0% +0.13 0–3 (0%) 1–1 -0.56
36 2017 1732 123.5 +3.00 +7.41 0.704 43.9% 25.0% -1.75 -0.44
37 2018 1708 119.9 -1.35 +6.34 0.890 49.7% 100.0% +1.50 1–0 -0.15
38 2019 1689 101.7
Career 2017 147.6 -0.10 +0.36 0.981 49.7% -14 -4 -12 50.4% -0.03 116–99 (54%) 134–143 (48%) 100.2 +0.42 1912 145.7 +0.30 -0.19 0.978 49.9% +7 -180 +50 50.7% +0.03 82–72 (53%) 104–89 (54%) 106.7 +0.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.