H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jurgen Melzer vs Donald Young H2H: 2-1
Jurgen Melzer holds a 2–1 lead over Donald Young in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Jurgen Melzer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Donald Young won the 2011 Washington third round 6-7(6) 6-4 3-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 45
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2011* | Washington | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Donald Young | 6-7(6) 6-4 3-1 (ret.) | Jurgen Melzer | Match data |
| Sep 25, 2008* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jurgen Melzer | 6-3 6-3 | Donald Young | Match data |
| May 21, 2008* | Poertschach | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jurgen Melzer | 7-5 6-2 | Donald Young | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jurgen Melzer | #1,552 | #8 | 3,055 | 2,024 | 326 | 303 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Donald Young | #1,350 | #38 | 1,039 | 1,942 | 125 | 187 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jurgen Melzer | Donald Young | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #553 | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,380 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #491 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #138 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #358 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #91 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #39 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #79 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–23 | 17.9% | #190 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #39 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #52 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #57 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #41 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #48 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #88 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #34 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #61 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #28 | 1,924 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #248 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 49–25 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,998 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2011 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #33 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2012 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #29 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #411 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2013 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #27 | 1,825 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2014 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #113 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #155 | 1,750 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #306 | 1,770 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #288 | 1,703 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |