H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jurgen Melzer vs Jiri Vanek H2H: 2-1
Jurgen Melzer holds a 2–1 lead over Jiri Vanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jurgen Melzer leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Jiri Vanek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jurgen Melzer won the 2008 US Open second round 6-0 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 45
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2008* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jurgen Melzer | 6-0 6-2 6-2 | Jiri Vanek | Match data |
| Jan 16, 2008* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jurgen Melzer | 6-3 6-4 6-4 | Jiri Vanek | Match data |
| Apr 28, 2006* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jiri Vanek | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Jurgen Melzer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jurgen Melzer | #1,552 | #8 | 3,055 | 2,024 | 326 | 303 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Jiri Vanek | #1,543 | #74 | 796 | 1,644 | 67 | 120 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jurgen Melzer | Jiri Vanek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #495 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #491 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #358 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2002 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #91 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2003 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #79 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #39 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #52 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #41 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #143 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #115 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #34 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #99 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #28 | 1,924 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #102 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 49–25 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,998 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #101 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2011 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #33 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #124 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2012 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #29 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2013 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #27 | 1,825 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2014 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #113 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #155 | 1,750 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #306 | 1,770 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #288 | 1,703 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |