H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jurgen Melzer vs Juan Ignacio Chela H2H: 2-2

Jurgen Melzer and Juan Ignacio Chela are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Juan Ignacio Chela leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Jurgen Melzer leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Juan Ignacio Chela won the 2007 Vienna Open second round 4-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jurgen Melzer
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Juan Ignacio Chela
ARG Age 47 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Juan Ignacio Chela #16 4-6 6-3 6-2 Jurgen Melzer #49 Match data Oct 12, 2007* R16 Vienna Open International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Jurgen Melzer #53 6-2 7-6(1) Juan Ignacio Chela #46 Match data Jan 12, 2006* R32 Sydney International ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Juan Ignacio Chela #26 7-6(3) 5-7 6-2 Jurgen Melzer #39 Match data Jan 8, 2005* QF Adelaide International ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Jurgen Melzer #43 6-1 6-4 Juan Ignacio Chela #25 Match data Nov 3, 2004* R64 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,017 331 307 51.9% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Juan Ignacio Chela #967 #15 1,510 1,908 307 270 53.2% 0 0 0 2 4 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jurgen Melzer Juan Ignacio Chela
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0 1999 0–3 0.0% #124 1,463 0 0
20 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0 2000 14–16 46.7% #63 1,558 0 1
21 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,660 0 0 2001 10–10 50.0% #70 1,601 0 1
22 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,583 0 0 2002 44–27 62.0% #23 1,782 0 2
23 2004 27–23 54.0% #39 1,759 0 0 2003 35–27 56.5% #38 1,762 0 2
24 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0 2004 33–26 55.9% #26 1,718 0 3
25 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,774 0 1 2005 28–26 51.9% #39 1,690 0 3
26 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,696 0 1 2006 27–26 50.9% #33 1,722 0 3
27 2008 29–24 54.7% #34 1,800 0 1 2007 39–23 62.9% #20 1,795 0 4
28 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,927 0 2 2008 11–12 47.8% #140 1,737 0 4
29 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,985 0 3 2009 9–14 39.1% #73 1,731 0 4
30 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,797 0 3 2010 28–24 53.8% #38 1,837 0 6
31 2012 18–23 43.9% #29 1,755 0 4 2011 24–24 50.0% #29 1,737 0 6
32 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,826 0 5 2012 5–12 29.4% #176 1,633 0 6
33 2014 14–20 41.2% #113 1,757 0 5 — — — — — — —
34 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,769 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5 — — — — — — —
37 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,708 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jurgen Melzer Juan Ignacio Chela
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1999 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2001 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 6 7 14.3% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2002 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2001 2 5 7 28.6% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — — — — —
22 2003 2 7 9 22.2% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2002 24 14 38 63.2% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2004 12 12 24 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2003 20 14 34 58.8% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2005 10 14 24 41.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 12 12 24 50.0% 20 11 31 64.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2006 9 11 20 45.0% 20 9 29 69.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 20 14 34 58.8% 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2007 14 14 28 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 10 11 21 47.6% 15 12 27 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 2008 17 15 32 53.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2007 17 11 28 60.7% 21 10 31 67.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2009 19 15 34 55.9% 12 9 21 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2008 2 4 6 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — —
29 2010 28 15 43 65.1% 17 8 25 68.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — — — — —
30 2011 10 13 23 43.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2010 7 11 18 38.9% 21 12 33 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2012 14 16 30 46.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2011 4 10 14 28.6% 19 13 32 59.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2013 19 13 32 59.4% 2 8 10 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2012 2 4 6 33.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2014 3 9 12 25.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 4 6 10 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2018 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 168 168 336 50.0% 120 101 221 54.3% 38 33 71 53.5% 5 5 10 50.0% — 122 120 242 50.4% 179 131 310 57.7% 4 11 15 26.7% 2 8 10 20.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 625/638 of Jurgen Melzer's and 447/453 of Juan Ignacio Chela's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jurgen Melzer Juan Ignacio Chela
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1999 2/2 5.0 8.5 40.6% 59.2% 42.2% 56.1% 65.6% 49.1% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 3/3 6.3 3.0 55.6% 64.6% 51.8% 38.5% 30.3% 59.7% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 1/2 5.0 3.0 59.4% 75.4% 41.0% 60.0% 18.2% 61.5% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 18/19 4.9 3.1 58.9% 72.7% 48.0% 53.1% 40.9% 62.5% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 29/29 6.7 4.7 56.8% 67.4% 44.1% 58.3% 41.9% 57.1% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2004 49/50 5.2 3.3 58.1% 72.6% 49.1% 63.9% 46.6% 62.8% 38.1% 2003 58/62 4.0 4.4 58.8% 69.7% 47.9% 54.8% 45.2% 60.5% 40.8%
24 2005 49/49 4.4 2.7 59.8% 68.4% 49.9% 58.8% 50.0% 60.8% 36.7% 2004 58/59 2.8 2.4 65.3% 66.8% 49.9% 53.6% 46.0% 60.9% 42.5%
25 2006 57/58 5.7 3.2 60.9% 69.3% 52.3% 62.2% 44.8% 62.5% 39.3% 2005 54/54 3.1 2.5 62.6% 68.2% 50.1% 56.5% 43.2% 61.3% 39.8%
26 2007 44/45 4.7 2.8 63.0% 67.4% 49.9% 58.3% 45.1% 61.2% 36.4% 2006 53/53 2.6 1.9 60.4% 69.2% 52.7% 63.5% 44.0% 62.5% 39.4%
27 2008 49/53 6.6 2.5 61.7% 71.5% 54.4% 57.6% 37.8% 65.0% 35.3% 2007 62/62 2.8 3.4 58.0% 69.7% 51.5% 54.4% 43.9% 62.2% 40.8%
28 2009 61/61 6.8 2.3 59.4% 73.4% 52.3% 58.8% 41.0% 64.9% 37.0% 2008 23/23 1.6 4.0 58.1% 62.8% 49.0% 56.5% 48.6% 56.9% 38.6%
29 2010 72/74 6.3 2.4 61.1% 72.2% 54.7% 59.9% 45.7% 65.3% 37.3% 2009 23/23 1.8 3.1 61.8% 66.1% 45.1% 61.1% 39.4% 58.1% 40.6%
30 2011 41/41 5.0 2.4 62.8% 68.9% 50.9% 51.6% 40.0% 62.1% 38.3% 2010 51/52 1.9 2.0 61.6% 65.8% 53.2% 54.6% 51.9% 60.9% 42.5%
31 2012 40/41 5.0 3.3 61.9% 69.0% 52.4% 52.4% 48.1% 62.4% 34.8% 2011 48/48 1.9 2.4 65.4% 65.6% 50.5% 58.7% 47.1% 60.3% 41.6%
32 2013 48/48 4.5 2.8 65.4% 67.2% 49.9% 56.8% 33.7% 61.1% 35.8% 2012 17/17 2.1 2.4 65.3% 61.8% 49.9% 56.0% 40.5% 57.6% 39.1%
33 2014 34/34 4.1 2.6 65.4% 67.2% 50.5% 54.5% 36.3% 61.2% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 20/20 3.3 4.0 61.0% 67.3% 49.3% 60.5% 41.5% 60.4% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 6/6 2.7 2.5 67.4% 66.9% 44.8% 60.6% 51.9% 59.3% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 1/1 4.0 1.0 74.8% 56.6% 53.6% 22.2% 75.0% 55.9% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2018 1/2 3.0 2.0 79.3% 72.5% 55.6% 100.0% 25.0% 69.0% 27.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 625/638 5.4 2.9 61.2% 69.8% 51.0% 58.0% 42.8% 62.4% 36.8% — 447/577 2.6 2.8 61.6% 67.4% 50.4% 56.7% 45.4% 60.7% 40.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jurgen Melzer Juan Ignacio Chela
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1999 1518 108.7 -0.28 +0.62 0.727 43.2% — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 1–0 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 1548 113.7 -1.47 -0.74 0.846 47.2% — — — 22.2% -1.22 0–1 0–2 — -0.26 1999 1464 96.2 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.28 0–1 — — +0.19
20 2001 1551 105.3 +1.50 -1.19 1.001 49.0% — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.04 2000 1559 133.5 — — — — -63 +120 — 44.9% -0.28 7–4 (64%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.31
21 2002 1660 130.8 +0.42 -0.51 0.980 49.6% -48 -49 — 50.0% -0.07 2–2 (50%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.12 2001 1602 129.7 — — — — -95 +120 — 56.9% +0.49 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) — +1.29
22 2003 1583 111.1 -3.51 -2.06 0.807 46.5% -20 -56 +87 39.0% -0.66 8–3 (73%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.49 2002 1783 151.5 — — — — -32 +59 — 56.5% +0.48 18–8 (69%) 18–14 (56%) — -1.32
23 2004 1760 142.0 +0.13 +1.60 1.023 50.6% -26 -102 -105 52.7% +0.22 8–8 (50%) 10–12 (45%) — -0.06 2003 1762 142.3 -1.02 +3.12 1.035 50.6% -22 +63 — 54.2% +0.28 11–8 (58%) 14–7 (67%) — -0.30
24 2005 1702 137.8 -0.93 +0.15 0.938 49.4% -35 +36 -24 50.0% -0.11 10–12 (45%) 8–9 (47%) — -0.88 2004 1718 148.1 -1.13 +4.91 1.089 51.6% -9 +123 — 53.9% +0.42 11–10 (52%) 5–11 (31%) — -1.39
25 2006 1774 133.3 +0.02 +1.44 1.047 51.0% -104 +59 -110 52.9% +0.07 11–13 (46%) 13–9 (59%) — -0.50 2005 1691 142.8 -0.78 +2.25 1.029 50.3% +64 +15 — 51.9% +0.01 7–8 (47%) 12–10 (55%) — +0.41
26 2007 1696 137.3 -1.21 +0.32 0.940 48.9% -11 +74 — 48.1% -0.22 9–7 (56%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.10 2006 1723 142.8 +0.65 +1.91 1.053 50.9% +36 +10 — 50.4% -0.03 6–11 (35%) 6–11 (35%) — -0.31
27 2008 1800 138.7 +1.21 -0.83 1.009 50.0% -22 -35 -116 52.4% +0.11 13–8 (62%) 13–15 (46%) — +0.86 2007 1796 148.8 -0.41 +3.45 1.078 51.3% +38 +27 -340 56.3% +0.40 15–5 (75%) 8–10 (44%) — +2.42
28 2009 1927 151.7 +1.63 +0.96 1.054 50.8% -29 -86 -117 55.1% +0.14 8–8 (50%) 14–8 (64%) — -1.10 2008 1738 127.4 -3.84 +1.12 0.895 47.8% +27 +71 — 41.1% -0.75 6–2 (75%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.48
29 2010 1986 158.2 +2.39 +1.03 1.076 51.1% -20 -6 -97 59.0% +0.57 15–7 (68%) 19–21 (48%) — +1.32 2009 1732 139.8 -3.44 +1.91 0.970 49.2% -13 +55 — 43.1% -0.12 5–6 (45%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.53
30 2011 1797 152.8 -0.17 +0.99 1.011 50.3% +17 +143 +139 52.0% +0.28 4–6 (40%) 6–7 (46%) — +1.81 2010 1838 147.5 -1.66 +4.86 1.088 51.7% -116 +93 — 51.2% +0.38 9–7 (56%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.78
31 2012 1755 145.9 -0.78 -0.89 0.925 48.7% +20 +103 +111 44.8% -0.47 9–7 (56%) 13–7 (65%) — +1.18 2011 1738 144.8 -2.16 +3.38 1.047 50.9% -88 +162 — 50.0% +0.18 9–10 (47%) 5–7 (42%) — +2.14
32 2013 1827 141.2 -1.23 -0.76 0.919 48.3% +22 -130 +72 47.5% -0.28 10–6 (63%) 8–10 (44%) — +2.36 2012 1634 126.2 -2.43 +0.71 0.923 48.4% +23 +118 — 42.9% -0.67 1–8 (11%) 4–2 (67%) — +1.58
33 2014 1757 141.1 -1.73 +1.12 0.955 49.1% +3 -5 +127 41.2% -0.46 6–7 (46%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 1750 127.3 -2.36 -0.42 0.914 48.8% +47 -54 — 44.7% -0.40 1–1 5–8 (38%) — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 1770 130.7 -0.27 +1.24 0.995 50.5% +16 -37 — 60.0% +0.13 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 1732 123.5 +3.00 +7.41 0.704 43.9% — — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2018 1708 119.9 -1.35 +6.34 0.890 49.7% — — — 100.0% +1.50 — 1–0 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2019 1689 101.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2017 147.6 -0.10 +0.36 0.981 49.7% -14 -4 -12 50.4% -0.03 116–99 (54%) 134–143 (48%) 100.2 +0.42 — 1909 149.6 -1.24 +3.12 1.040 50.7% -9 +79 -340 51.6% +0.16 107–94 (53%) 92–103 (47%) 98.2 +0.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.