H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Jurgen Melzer vs Vasek Pospisil H2H: 0-1

Vasek Pospisil holds a 1–0 lead over Jurgen Melzer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vasek Pospisil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vasek Pospisil won the 2012 Kuala Lumpur round of 32 6-4 2-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jurgen Melzer
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Vasek Pospisil
CAN Age 36 Right-Handed 194 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Vasek Pospisil #122 6-4 2-0 (ret.) Jurgen Melzer #37 Match data Sep 27, 2012* R32 Kuala Lumpur ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,017 331 307 51.9% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Vasek Pospisil #1,265 #25 1,359 1,957 122 163 42.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jurgen Melzer Vasek Pospisil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,660 0 0 2011 3–4 42.9% #119 1,668 0 0
22 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,583 0 0 2012 4–13 23.5% #125 1,619 0 0
23 2004 27–23 54.0% #39 1,759 0 0 2013 17–15 53.1% #32 1,800 0 0
24 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0 2014 20–24 45.5% #53 1,807 0 0
25 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,774 0 1 2015 24–22 52.2% #39 1,869 0 0
26 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,696 0 1 2016 9–22 29.0% #133 1,746 0 0
27 2008 29–24 54.7% #34 1,800 0 1 2017 6–13 31.6% #108 1,693 0 0
28 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,927 0 2 2018 8–14 36.4% #70 1,756 0 0
29 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,985 0 3 2019 3–5 37.5% #149 1,809 0 0
30 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,797 0 3 2020 16–10 61.5% #61 1,925 0 0
31 2012 18–23 43.9% #29 1,755 0 4 2021 8–14 36.4% #133 1,762 0 0
32 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,826 0 5 2022 4–3 57.1% #98 1,717 0 0
33 2014 14–20 41.2% #113 1,757 0 5 2023 0–2 0.0% #437 1,649 0 0
34 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5 2024 0–1 0.0% #733 1,627 0 0
35 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,769 0 5 2025 0–1 0.0% #1265 1,611 0 0
36 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5 — — — — — — —
37 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,708 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jurgen Melzer Vasek Pospisil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1999 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 2 7 9 22.2% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2012 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — —
23 2004 12 12 24 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2013 15 12 27 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
24 2005 10 14 24 41.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2014 17 17 34 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
25 2006 9 11 20 45.0% 20 9 29 69.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 19 17 36 52.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
26 2007 14 14 28 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 8 14 22 36.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
27 2008 17 15 32 53.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2017 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
28 2009 19 15 34 55.9% 12 9 21 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2018 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2010 28 15 43 65.1% 17 8 25 68.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2019 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2011 10 13 23 43.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2020 16 9 25 64.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2012 14 16 30 46.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2021 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
32 2013 19 13 32 59.4% 2 8 10 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2022 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 3 9 12 25.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2023 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 4 6 10 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2024 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2018 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 168 168 336 50.0% 120 101 221 54.3% 38 33 71 53.5% 5 5 10 50.0% — 103 120 223 46.2% 0 14 14 0.0% 19 29 48 39.6% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 625/638 of Jurgen Melzer's and 281/285 of Vasek Pospisil's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jurgen Melzer Vasek Pospisil
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1999 2/2 5.0 8.5 40.6% 59.2% 42.2% 56.1% 65.6% 49.1% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 3/3 6.3 3.0 55.6% 64.6% 51.8% 38.5% 30.3% 59.7% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 1/2 5.0 3.0 59.4% 75.4% 41.0% 60.0% 18.2% 61.5% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 18/19 4.9 3.1 58.9% 72.7% 48.0% 53.1% 40.9% 62.5% 36.7% 2011 7/7 8.6 4.4 54.5% 73.1% 51.4% 52.5% 39.2% 63.1% 33.1%
22 2003 29/29 6.7 4.7 56.8% 67.4% 44.1% 58.3% 41.9% 57.1% 34.6% 2012 16/17 8.3 3.8 56.2% 71.4% 45.1% 56.2% 30.5% 59.9% 32.7%
23 2004 49/50 5.2 3.3 58.1% 72.6% 49.1% 63.9% 46.6% 62.8% 38.1% 2013 32/32 11.2 4.0 54.4% 80.6% 53.7% 61.1% 38.8% 68.5% 37.0%
24 2005 49/49 4.4 2.7 59.8% 68.4% 49.9% 58.8% 50.0% 60.8% 36.7% 2014 42/44 9.3 3.8 59.4% 75.1% 51.2% 61.4% 38.0% 65.4% 33.2%
25 2006 57/58 5.7 3.2 60.9% 69.3% 52.3% 62.2% 44.8% 62.5% 39.3% 2015 46/46 10.7 3.2 58.2% 77.7% 53.6% 66.1% 39.6% 67.8% 32.0%
26 2007 44/45 4.7 2.8 63.0% 67.4% 49.9% 58.3% 45.1% 61.2% 36.4% 2016 30/31 8.5 3.4 58.7% 73.8% 50.0% 45.5% 44.8% 63.8% 31.2%
27 2008 49/53 6.6 2.5 61.7% 71.5% 54.4% 57.6% 37.8% 65.0% 35.3% 2017 19/19 8.3 2.7 56.8% 73.2% 49.1% 52.9% 46.5% 63.0% 33.1%
28 2009 61/61 6.8 2.3 59.4% 73.4% 52.3% 58.8% 41.0% 64.9% 37.0% 2018 22/22 8.6 4.2 58.8% 74.0% 50.4% 66.4% 38.2% 64.4% 31.5%
29 2010 72/74 6.3 2.4 61.1% 72.2% 54.7% 59.9% 45.7% 65.3% 37.3% 2019 8/8 9.6 3.4 59.5% 79.6% 49.3% 55.6% 44.5% 67.4% 32.6%
30 2011 41/41 5.0 2.4 62.8% 68.9% 50.9% 51.6% 40.0% 62.1% 38.3% 2020 26/26 10.2 3.2 61.4% 78.0% 50.9% 72.5% 37.0% 67.5% 35.3%
31 2012 40/41 5.0 3.3 61.9% 69.0% 52.4% 52.4% 48.1% 62.4% 34.8% 2021 22/22 9.7 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 46.7% 67.6% 42.4% 63.3% 31.3%
32 2013 48/48 4.5 2.8 65.4% 67.2% 49.9% 56.8% 33.7% 61.1% 35.8% 2022 7/7 10.6 2.3 59.6% 83.0% 49.8% 53.0% 30.2% 69.4% 34.1%
33 2014 34/34 4.1 2.6 65.4% 67.2% 50.5% 54.5% 36.3% 61.2% 37.0% 2023 2/2 10.5 8.0 51.0% 71.1% 48.0% 66.1% 47.1% 59.3% 35.0%
34 2015 20/20 3.3 4.0 61.0% 67.3% 49.3% 60.5% 41.5% 60.4% 36.2% 2024 1/1 1.0 0.0 54.5% 83.3% 20.0% 0.0% — 54.5% 33.3%
35 2016 6/6 2.7 2.5 67.4% 66.9% 44.8% 60.6% 51.9% 59.3% 40.5% 2025 1/1 6.0 5.0 44.0% 89.0% 30.0% 44.0% 75.0% 56.0% 32.0%
36 2017 1/1 4.0 1.0 74.8% 56.6% 53.6% 22.2% 75.0% 55.9% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2018 1/2 3.0 2.0 79.3% 72.5% 55.6% 100.0% 25.0% 69.0% 27.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 625/638 5.4 2.9 61.2% 69.8% 51.0% 58.0% 42.8% 62.4% 36.8% — 281/285 9.6 3.5 58.0% 76.2% 50.5% 60.6% 39.6% 65.4% 33.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jurgen Melzer Vasek Pospisil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1999 1518 108.7 -0.28 +0.62 0.727 43.2% — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 1–0 — -0.03 2008 1483 94.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 1548 113.7 -1.47 -0.74 0.846 47.2% — — — 22.2% -1.22 0–1 0–2 — -0.26 2009 1473 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 1551 105.3 +1.50 -1.19 1.001 49.0% — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.04 2010 1449 100.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 1660 130.8 +0.42 -0.51 0.980 49.6% -48 -49 — 50.0% -0.07 2–2 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 +0.12 2011 1669 135.2 +0.34 +0.71 0.897 48.7% +21 — — 42.1% +0.11 2–0 1–3 (25%) — -0.34
22 2003 1583 111.1 -3.51 -2.06 0.807 46.5% -20 -56 +87 39.0% -0.66 8–3 (73%) 7–6 (54%) 104.3 +0.49 2012 1619 116.6 -1.54 -2.79 0.814 46.9% +14 — -31 25.0% -1.43 2–2 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 98.7 -0.02
23 2004 1760 142.0 +0.13 +1.60 1.023 50.6% -26 -102 -105 52.7% +0.22 8–8 (50%) 10–12 (45%) 100.0 -0.06 2013 1800 148.9 +3.32 +0.96 1.175 52.2% -21 — -159 53.5% +0.38 7–12 (37%) 11–13 (46%) 98.8 +1.76
24 2005 1702 137.8 -0.93 +0.15 0.938 49.4% -35 +36 -24 50.0% -0.11 10–12 (45%) 8–9 (47%) 96.3 -0.88 2014 1807 146.4 +1.54 -1.76 0.960 49.4% +9 -326 -174 48.1% -0.06 7–9 (44%) 7–11 (39%) 94.9 +1.15
25 2006 1774 133.3 +0.02 +1.44 1.047 51.0% -104 +59 -110 52.9% +0.07 11–13 (46%) 13–9 (59%) 100.1 -0.50 2015 1869 156.2 +3.23 -2.76 0.995 50.3% +6 — -82 49.6% +0.03 8–6 (57%) 8–16 (33%) 99.1 -0.84
26 2007 1696 137.3 -1.21 +0.32 0.940 48.9% -11 +74 — 48.1% -0.22 9–7 (56%) 7–11 (39%) 95.6 +0.10 2016 1747 141.0 +0.35 -3.11 0.863 47.7% +33 -313 -51 32.0% -1.07 3–5 (38%) 9–11 (45%) 96.6 -1.55
27 2008 1800 138.7 +1.21 -0.83 1.009 50.0% -22 -35 -116 52.4% +0.11 13–8 (62%) 13–15 (46%) 104.7 +0.86 2017 1693 134.0 -0.45 -1.33 0.895 48.1% -4 — +64 37.2% -0.74 2–6 (25%) 6–5 (55%) 97.2 -1.00
28 2009 1927 151.7 +1.63 +0.96 1.054 50.8% -29 -86 -117 55.1% +0.14 8–8 (50%) 14–8 (64%) 105.0 -1.10 2018 1756 139.4 +0.81 -2.42 0.885 48.8% +23 — -49 41.1% -0.54 1–4 (20%) 7–7 (50%) 97.6 -0.26
29 2010 1986 158.2 +2.39 +1.03 1.076 51.1% -20 -6 -97 59.0% +0.57 15–7 (68%) 19–21 (48%) 104.8 +1.32 2019 1809 142.8 +2.29 -1.10 0.999 50.2% +18 — — 44.0% -0.40 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 101.0 -0.58
30 2011 1797 152.8 -0.17 +0.99 1.011 50.3% +17 +143 +139 52.0% +0.28 4–6 (40%) 6–7 (46%) 95.7 +1.81 2020 1926 160.3 +3.38 +0.49 1.086 51.7% +27 — — 54.7% +0.34 4–2 (67%) 5–7 (42%) 100.4 -2.70
31 2012 1755 145.9 -0.78 -0.89 0.925 48.7% +20 +103 +111 44.8% -0.47 9–7 (56%) 13–7 (65%) 102.7 +1.18 2021 1762 131.1 +0.54 -3.48 0.852 48.1% +48 — -121 37.7% -0.55 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) 94.3 -1.01
32 2013 1827 141.2 -1.23 -0.76 0.919 48.3% +22 -130 +72 47.5% -0.28 10–6 (63%) 8–10 (44%) 101.5 +2.36 2022 1717 128.5 +1.53 +0.90 1.112 51.8% +55 — — 50.0% +0.69 2–0 2–2 (50%) — +0.27
33 2014 1757 141.1 -1.73 +1.12 0.955 49.1% +3 -5 +127 41.2% -0.46 6–7 (46%) 7–10 (41%) 98.0 -1.34 2023 1650 115.7 -0.70 +0.42 0.858 47.2% — — — 16.7% -0.67 — 0–2 — -0.17
34 2015 1750 127.3 -2.36 -0.42 0.914 48.8% +47 -54 — 44.7% -0.40 1–1 5–8 (38%) — -0.22 2024 1628 102.0 +0.93 +1.43 0.733 47.1% — — — — — — — — -0.12
35 2016 1770 130.7 -0.27 +1.24 0.995 50.5% +16 -37 — 60.0% +0.13 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.56 2025 1612 99.9 -0.40 -0.46 0.727 45.0% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.10
36 2017 1732 123.5 +3.00 +7.41 0.704 43.9% — — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2018 1708 119.9 -1.35 +6.34 0.890 49.7% — — — 100.0% +1.50 — 1–0 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2019 1689 101.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2017 147.6 -0.10 +0.36 0.981 49.7% -14 -4 -12 50.4% -0.03 116–99 (54%) 134–143 (48%) 100.2 +0.42 — 1958 149.6 +1.58 -1.59 0.958 49.5% +15 -320 -72 44.0% -0.26 42–53 (44%) 64–88 (42%) 92.9 -1.88

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.