H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jurgen Melzer vs Wayne Odesnik H2H: 1-1

Jurgen Melzer and Wayne Odesnik are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Wayne Odesnik leads 1–0 on clay, while Jurgen Melzer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jurgen Melzer won the 2009 Wimbledon first round 6-1 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jurgen Melzer
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Wayne Odesnik
USA Age 40 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jurgen Melzer #30 6-1 6-4 6-2 Wayne Odesnik #109 Match data Jun 24, 2009* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Wayne Odesnik #100 6-4 6-0 Jurgen Melzer #31 Match data Apr 10, 2009* R16 U.S. Men's Clay Court Championship ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,017 331 307 51.9% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Wayne Odesnik #267 #77 984 1,734 40 59 40.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jurgen Melzer Wayne Odesnik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0 2004 0–3 0.0% #383 1,463 0 0
19 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0 2005 0–2 0.0% #265 1,451 0 0
20 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% #194 1,420 0 0
21 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,660 0 0 2007 4–3 57.1% #126 1,567 0 0
22 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,583 0 0 2008 13–15 46.4% #119 1,670 0 0
23 2004 27–23 54.0% #39 1,759 0 0 2009 10–13 43.5% #105 1,684 0 0
24 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0 2010 7–7 50.0% #813 1,704 0 0
25 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,774 0 1 2011 0–1 0.0% #129 1,661 0 0
26 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,696 0 1 2012 4–6 40.0% #143 1,647 0 0
27 2008 29–24 54.7% #34 1,800 0 1 2013 2–3 40.0% #138 1,681 0 0
28 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,927 0 2 2014 0–5 0.0% #171 1,628 0 0
29 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,985 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,797 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2012 18–23 43.9% #29 1,755 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,826 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2014 14–20 41.2% #113 1,757 0 5 — — — — — — —
34 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,769 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5 — — — — — — —
37 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,708 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jurgen Melzer Wayne Odesnik
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1999 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2000 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2007 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 2 7 9 22.2% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2008 7 11 18 38.9% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2004 12 12 24 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2009 6 9 15 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2005 10 14 24 41.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 4 6 10 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2006 9 11 20 45.0% 20 9 29 69.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2007 14 14 28 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2008 17 15 32 53.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2013 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2009 19 15 34 55.9% 12 9 21 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2014 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2010 28 15 43 65.1% 17 8 25 68.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2011 10 13 23 43.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2012 14 16 30 46.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2013 19 13 32 59.4% 2 8 10 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 3 9 12 25.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 4 6 10 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2018 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 168 168 336 50.0% 120 101 221 54.3% 38 33 71 53.5% 5 5 10 50.0% — 22 41 63 34.9% 18 13 31 58.1% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 625/638 of Jurgen Melzer's and 97/99 of Wayne Odesnik's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jurgen Melzer Wayne Odesnik
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1999 2/2 5.0 8.5 40.6% 59.2% 42.2% 56.1% 65.6% 49.1% 37.0% 2004 3/3 7.0 2.0 58.5% 64.4% 41.1% 52.4% 45.6% 55.0% 33.5%
19 2000 3/3 6.3 3.0 55.6% 64.6% 51.8% 38.5% 30.3% 59.7% 34.1% 2005 2/2 4.0 3.0 65.4% 64.6% 63.3% 55.0% 8.3% 64.2% 31.4%
20 2001 1/2 5.0 3.0 59.4% 75.4% 41.0% 60.0% 18.2% 61.5% 38.6% 2006 1/1 19.0 3.0 64.6% 68.8% 51.4% 58.3% 40.0% 62.6% 29.5%
21 2002 18/19 4.9 3.1 58.9% 72.7% 48.0% 53.1% 40.9% 62.5% 36.7% 2007 7/7 9.0 3.3 68.8% 70.3% 53.7% 58.7% 56.6% 65.2% 32.4%
22 2003 29/29 6.7 4.7 56.8% 67.4% 44.1% 58.3% 41.9% 57.1% 34.6% 2008 27/28 4.5 2.6 61.2% 67.7% 49.4% 56.6% 40.4% 60.8% 38.4%
23 2004 49/50 5.2 3.3 58.1% 72.6% 49.1% 63.9% 46.6% 62.8% 38.1% 2009 23/23 5.3 2.4 61.1% 66.3% 51.8% 57.7% 36.9% 60.6% 36.8%
24 2005 49/49 4.4 2.7 59.8% 68.4% 49.9% 58.8% 50.0% 60.8% 36.7% 2010 13/14 5.5 3.8 58.3% 68.2% 52.0% 71.2% 44.3% 61.4% 39.4%
25 2006 57/58 5.7 3.2 60.9% 69.3% 52.3% 62.2% 44.8% 62.5% 39.3% 2011 1/1 2.0 2.0 70.0% 50.0% 16.7% 28.6% — 40.0% 20.0%
26 2007 44/45 4.7 2.8 63.0% 67.4% 49.9% 58.3% 45.1% 61.2% 36.4% 2012 10/10 3.7 3.9 59.2% 65.3% 44.2% 58.2% 46.5% 56.5% 36.8%
27 2008 49/53 6.6 2.5 61.7% 71.5% 54.4% 57.6% 37.8% 65.0% 35.3% 2013 5/5 2.8 1.6 66.7% 61.8% 52.7% 47.3% 41.7% 58.5% 37.4%
28 2009 61/61 6.8 2.3 59.4% 73.4% 52.3% 58.8% 41.0% 64.9% 37.0% 2014 5/5 6.0 2.6 60.5% 59.9% 52.9% 51.9% 17.8% 57.6% 29.8%
29 2010 72/74 6.3 2.4 61.1% 72.2% 54.7% 59.9% 45.7% 65.3% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2011 41/41 5.0 2.4 62.8% 68.9% 50.9% 51.6% 40.0% 62.1% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2012 40/41 5.0 3.3 61.9% 69.0% 52.4% 52.4% 48.1% 62.4% 34.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2013 48/48 4.5 2.8 65.4% 67.2% 49.9% 56.8% 33.7% 61.1% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 34/34 4.1 2.6 65.4% 67.2% 50.5% 54.5% 36.3% 61.2% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 20/20 3.3 4.0 61.0% 67.3% 49.3% 60.5% 41.5% 60.4% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 6/6 2.7 2.5 67.4% 66.9% 44.8% 60.6% 51.9% 59.3% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 1/1 4.0 1.0 74.8% 56.6% 53.6% 22.2% 75.0% 55.9% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2018 1/2 3.0 2.0 79.3% 72.5% 55.6% 100.0% 25.0% 69.0% 27.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 625/638 5.4 2.9 61.2% 69.8% 51.0% 58.0% 42.8% 62.4% 36.8% — 97/99 5.3 2.8 61.5% 66.3% 50.1% 58.0% 39.9% 60.1% 36.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jurgen Melzer Wayne Odesnik
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1999 1518 108.7 -0.28 +0.62 0.727 43.2% — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 1–0 — -0.03 2004 1463 94.9 -0.07 -1.72 0.744 44.7% — — — 22.2% -2.11 0–1 0–1 — +0.12
19 2000 1548 113.7 -1.47 -0.74 0.846 47.2% — — — 22.2% -1.22 0–1 0–2 — -0.26 2005 1452 101.4 +0.34 -0.56 0.877 46.5% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.03
20 2001 1551 105.3 +1.50 -1.19 1.001 49.0% — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.04 2006 1421 97.3 -1.63 +0.51 0.791 47.1% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.14
21 2002 1660 130.8 +0.42 -0.51 0.980 49.6% -48 -49 — 50.0% -0.07 2–2 (50%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.12 2007 1567 118.6 -0.22 -0.70 0.931 48.9% +10 — — 47.8% +0.04 4–2 (67%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.76
22 2003 1583 111.1 -3.51 -2.06 0.807 46.5% -20 -56 +87 39.0% -0.66 8–3 (73%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.49 2008 1670 125.5 -2.14 +0.76 0.979 49.4% -43 -14 — 49.3% -0.07 5–4 (56%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.67
23 2004 1760 142.0 +0.13 +1.60 1.023 50.6% -26 -102 -105 52.7% +0.22 8–8 (50%) 10–12 (45%) — -0.06 2009 1685 131.9 -2.07 +0.91 0.936 48.6% -19 -9 — 40.3% -0.69 7–3 (70%) 5–1 (83%) — -0.12
24 2005 1702 137.8 -0.93 +0.15 0.938 49.4% -35 +36 -24 50.0% -0.11 10–12 (45%) 8–9 (47%) — -0.88 2010 1705 130.0 -1.59 +1.55 1.020 50.9% -53 +3 — 55.9% +0.74 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.09
25 2006 1774 133.3 +0.02 +1.44 1.047 51.0% -104 +59 -110 52.9% +0.07 11–13 (46%) 13–9 (59%) — -0.50 2011 1662 102.8 -0.85 -1.17 0.333 30.7% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.05
26 2007 1696 137.3 -1.21 +0.32 0.940 48.9% -11 +74 — 48.1% -0.22 9–7 (56%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.10 2012 1647 117.7 -3.09 -1.64 0.846 46.9% — +67 — 39.3% -0.86 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.14
27 2008 1800 138.7 +1.21 -0.83 1.009 50.0% -22 -35 -116 52.4% +0.11 13–8 (62%) 13–15 (46%) — +0.86 2013 1682 126.7 +0.10 -0.21 0.901 48.1% — — — 50.0% -0.57 0–2 0–1 — -0.03
28 2009 1927 151.7 +1.63 +0.96 1.054 50.8% -29 -86 -117 55.1% +0.14 8–8 (50%) 14–8 (64%) — -1.10 2014 1629 112.5 -2.53 -0.84 0.702 44.2% -11 — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.38
29 2010 1986 158.2 +2.39 +1.03 1.076 51.1% -20 -6 -97 59.0% +0.57 15–7 (68%) 19–21 (48%) — +1.32 2015 1631 105.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2011 1797 152.8 -0.17 +0.99 1.011 50.3% +17 +143 +139 52.0% +0.28 4–6 (40%) 6–7 (46%) — +1.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2012 1755 145.9 -0.78 -0.89 0.925 48.7% +20 +103 +111 44.8% -0.47 9–7 (56%) 13–7 (65%) — +1.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2013 1827 141.2 -1.23 -0.76 0.919 48.3% +22 -130 +72 47.5% -0.28 10–6 (63%) 8–10 (44%) — +2.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 1757 141.1 -1.73 +1.12 0.955 49.1% +3 -5 +127 41.2% -0.46 6–7 (46%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 1750 127.3 -2.36 -0.42 0.914 48.8% +47 -54 — 44.7% -0.40 1–1 5–8 (38%) — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 1770 130.7 -0.27 +1.24 0.995 50.5% +16 -37 — 60.0% +0.13 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 1732 123.5 +3.00 +7.41 0.704 43.9% — — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2018 1708 119.9 -1.35 +6.34 0.890 49.7% — — — 100.0% +1.50 — 1–0 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2019 1689 101.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2017 147.6 -0.10 +0.36 0.981 49.7% -14 -4 -12 50.4% -0.03 116–99 (54%) 134–143 (48%) 100.2 +0.42 — 1735 127.8 -1.78 +0.29 0.915 48.4% -29 +13 — 42.3% -0.50 21–18 (54%) 20–17 (54%) 105.5 +1.35

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.