H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Jurgen Zopp vs Daniel Brands H2H: 0-1

Daniel Brands holds a 1–0 lead over Jurgen Zopp in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Brands leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Brands won the 2012 Tiriac Open round of 16 7-6(3) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jurgen Zopp
EST Age 38 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Daniel Brands
GER Age 39 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Brands #119 7-6(3) 6-3 Jurgen Zopp #125 Match data Apr 27, 2012* R16 Tiriac Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jurgen Zopp #1,406 #71 656 1,715 16 31 34.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daniel Brands #1,055 #51 896 1,886 58 93 38.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jurgen Zopp Daniel Brands
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2007 1–1 50.0% #220 1,491 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2008 1–4 20.0% #150 1,539 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2009 7–5 58.3% #92 1,645 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2010 9–19 32.1% #104 1,670 0 0
23 2011 0–1 0.0% #146 1,562 0 0 2011 4–11 26.7% #110 1,690 0 0
24 2012 7–11 38.9% #89 1,672 0 0 2012 5–8 38.5% #153 1,688 0 0
25 2013 1–6 14.3% #334 1,610 0 0 2013 23–23 50.0% #54 1,809 0 0
26 2014 1–2 33.3% #189 1,629 0 0 2014 2–11 15.4% #329 1,713 0 0
27 2015 0–2 0.0% #163 1,600 0 0 2015 2–1 66.7% #159 1,729 0 0
28 2016 1–2 33.3% #329 1,597 0 0 2016 2–4 33.3% #168 1,660 0 0
29 2017 1–1 50.0% #163 1,611 0 0 2017 1–4 20.0% #320 1,664 0 0
30 2018 5–6 45.5% #143 1,599 0 0 2018 0–1 0.0% #182 1,616 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2019 1–1 50.0% #465 1,605 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jurgen Zopp Daniel Brands
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
23 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 4 5 9 44.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 2 4 6 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
25 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 11 12 23 47.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 2014 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
28 2016 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2017 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2018 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2018 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 6 15 21 28.6% 10 13 23 43.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — 30 49 79 38.0% 21 34 55 38.2% 7 10 17 41.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jurgen Zopp Daniel Brands
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 7.5 2.0 64.3% 87.8% 59.9% 100.0% 16.7% 77.8% 23.5%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 5/5 8.0 4.4 61.7% 75.9% 40.5% 48.6% 34.2% 63.2% 30.6%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 12/12 8.3 3.3 67.9% 76.6% 51.4% 69.8% 37.8% 68.6% 34.8%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 28/28 9.3 3.0 64.5% 69.9% 53.9% 57.0% 31.5% 63.9% 29.5%
23 2011 1/1 6.0 4.0 55.1% 65.3% 57.5% 55.6% 25.0% 61.8% 32.7% 2011 15/15 7.0 3.0 68.7% 68.6% 47.4% 57.3% 31.0% 61.7% 28.0%
24 2012 18/18 4.9 2.5 60.9% 68.5% 49.5% 53.7% 35.4% 60.8% 35.8% 2012 13/13 11.1 3.8 63.0% 76.4% 48.5% 49.4% 35.6% 66.2% 31.8%
25 2013 7/7 3.6 4.4 57.0% 61.1% 39.8% 62.0% 40.7% 53.0% 32.2% 2013 46/46 8.5 2.2 66.8% 72.9% 53.0% 57.6% 35.3% 66.2% 33.4%
26 2014 3/3 3.7 2.7 59.3% 68.0% 50.2% 8.3% 62.5% 60.6% 21.6% 2014 13/13 9.2 1.8 69.7% 68.9% 50.3% 62.1% 22.8% 62.9% 29.5%
27 2015 2/2 3.0 1.5 64.1% 66.3% 50.4% 68.3% 0.0% 60.4% 24.5% 2015 3/3 7.3 3.3 54.4% 75.4% 62.8% 43.8% 27.8% 71.2% 37.0%
28 2016 3/3 5.7 3.3 64.4% 71.1% 51.9% 61.1% 13.3% 64.0% 33.3% 2016 6/6 12.3 5.0 64.1% 72.7% 51.2% 59.5% 53.3% 64.7% 32.0%
29 2017 2/2 7.0 2.5 58.8% 73.1% 44.6% 50.0% 50.0% 61.2% 33.1% 2017 5/5 7.0 5.2 64.9% 70.4% 41.0% 62.4% 23.2% 59.4% 29.4%
30 2018 11/11 5.7 2.3 60.5% 73.3% 49.9% 57.1% 36.3% 64.1% 32.0% 2018 1/1 13.0 4.0 71.7% 70.4% 64.3% 66.7% 0.0% 68.7% 28.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 2/2 8.0 3.0 66.9% 67.0% 55.3% 66.7% 43.8% 63.0% 35.5%
Career — 47/47 4.9 2.8 60.3% 68.7% 48.4% 53.8% 35.6% 60.6% 32.7% — 151/151 8.8 3.0 66.0% 72.3% 51.4% 58.5% 33.1% 65.1% 31.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jurgen Zopp Daniel Brands
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1492 106.0 -2.82 -3.49 1.057 51.7% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1540 111.5 -1.86 -1.37 0.830 46.7% — +37 — 25.0% -1.50 0–1 — — +0.09
21 2009 1497 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1645 119.5 +2.51 -1.77 1.108 51.4% — +44 — 53.3% +0.30 3–3 (50%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.22
22 2010 1506 104.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1671 129.6 +0.41 -4.53 0.817 46.9% -109 -45 +44 34.3% -1.14 3–4 (43%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.34
23 2011 1562 114.9 -2.32 -0.40 0.855 46.3% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.12 2011 1691 120.3 -1.58 -5.51 0.732 45.6% -31 -86 — 27.8% -1.61 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.41
24 2012 1673 129.4 -1.18 -1.00 0.914 47.9% -32 -11 — 39.5% -0.60 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +1.46 2012 1689 117.4 +1.52 -2.94 0.940 48.7% +10 -50 — 45.5% -0.36 1–3 (25%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.51
25 2013 1611 113.7 -2.66 -1.98 0.685 44.0% +2 — — 26.3% -1.26 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.39 2013 1809 149.3 +2.79 -2.73 0.988 49.7% -11 +4 -192 47.8% -0.11 7–5 (58%) 9–9 (50%) — -2.24
26 2014 1630 104.2 -0.71 -2.27 0.548 42.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–2 — -0.15 2014 1713 128.9 -0.97 -3.58 0.796 46.4% +3 — — 33.3% -1.28 0–6 (0%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.62
27 2015 1601 110.9 -0.02 -3.75 0.619 42.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.03 2015 1729 122.1 +0.44 +1.03 1.284 52.5% +26 — — 57.1% +0.14 1–0 1–0 — -0.11
28 2016 1597 114.6 -0.16 -2.06 0.925 47.6% — — — 42.9% -1.57 0–1 1–0 — -0.06 2016 1661 117.0 +0.34 -3.35 0.907 48.9% +50 — — 42.1% -0.32 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.06
29 2017 1611 112.7 +0.06 +0.46 0.854 47.8% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — -0.05 2017 1665 110.8 -1.31 -3.25 0.724 45.2% — — — 16.7% -1.42 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.08
30 2018 1599 112.1 -0.70 -2.21 0.893 48.3% — +106 — 41.2% -0.29 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.93 2018 1616 97.9 +1.38 +0.15 0.912 48.0% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.04
31 2019 1548 96.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1605 109.1 +0.20 -3.04 0.961 49.1% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — -0.28
Career — 1716 120.9 -1.12 -1.62 0.830 46.8% -22 +51 — 34.7% -0.83 8–9 (47%) 3–9 (25%) 95.8 +3.51 — 1886 131.0 +0.91 -3.27 0.900 48.3% -25 -9 -63 40.4% -0.64 18–26 (41%) 43–43 (50%) 98.0 -2.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.