H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Kamil Majchrzak vs Joao Sousa H2H: 1-0
Kamil Majchrzak holds a 1–0 lead over Joao Sousa in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kamil Majchrzak leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kamil Majchrzak won the 2021 Lyon third round 6-3 7-6(8).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Poland
Age 30
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POR
Age 37
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2021* | Lyon | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Kamil Majchrzak | 6-3 7-6(8) | Joao Sousa | Match data |
| Aug 22, 2020* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Kamil Majchrzak | 6-3 6-3 | Joao Sousa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kamil Majchrzak | #66 | #45 | 1,032 | 1,822 | 46 | 55 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Joao Sousa | #954 | #28 | 1,355 | 1,917 | 189 | 247 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kamil Majchrzak | Joao Sousa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #592 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #49 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #117 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 23–33 | 41.1% | #54 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #33 | 1,904 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #57 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2025 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #62 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #44 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2026 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #66 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #60 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #140 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #249 | 1,509 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #726 | 1,503 | 0 | 4 |