H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Kamil Majchrzak vs Pablo Cuevas H2H: 1-0
Kamil Majchrzak holds a 1–0 lead over Pablo Cuevas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kamil Majchrzak leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kamil Majchrzak won the 2019 US Open second round 6-7(3) 6-4 2-6 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Poland
Age 30
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
URU
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2019* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Kamil Majchrzak | 6-7(3) 6-4 2-6 6-4 6-1 | Pablo Cuevas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kamil Majchrzak | #66 | #45 | 1,032 | 1,822 | 46 | 55 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Pablo Cuevas | #841 | #19 | 1,865 | 1,960 | 211 | 212 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kamil Majchrzak | Pablo Cuevas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #50 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #117 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #142 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2025 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #62 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #40 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2026 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #66 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #32 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #45 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #97 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #269 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 |