H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Karel Novacek vs Petr Korda H2H: 0-1
Petr Korda holds a 1–0 lead over Karel Novacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Petr Korda leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Petr Korda won the 1994 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 58
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 1994* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Petr Korda | 6-4 7-5 | Karel Novacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karel Novacek | #1,345 | #8 | 1,754 | 1,997 | 287 | 231 | 55.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 13 |
| Petr Korda | #1,382 | #2 | 3,499 | 2,110 | 378 | 238 | 61.4% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karel Novacek | Petr Korda | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #794 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #87 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #188 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #59 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #76 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #38 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #9 | 1,922 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #74 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 57–28 | 67.1% | #7 | 1,940 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #34 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #12 | 1,954 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1991 | 56–29 | 65.9% | #8 | 1,845 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #18 | 1,838 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1992 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #23 | 1,819 | 0 | 10 | 1995 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #41 | 1,801 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1993 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 12 | 1996 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #24 | 1,904 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,788 | 0 | 13 | 1997 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #13 | 1,976 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #121 | 1,595 | 0 | 13 | 1998 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #13 | 1,777 | 1 | 10 |
| 31 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #409 | 1,580 | 0 | 13 | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #170 | 1,674 | 1 | 10 |