H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Karen Khachanov vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 0-1

Daniel Gimeno-Traver holds a 1–0 lead over Karen Khachanov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2014 Miami Open first round 6-7(8) 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Karen Khachanov
Russia Age 30 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #99 6-7(8) 6-1 6-1 Karen Khachanov #453 Match data Mar 21, 2014* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Karen Khachanov #50 #8 3,280 2,096 321 233 57.9% 0 1 0 0 6 7
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Karen Khachanov Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2013 3–2 60.0% #451 1,558 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2014 0–2 0.0% #372 1,533 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 2016 13–9 59.1% #53 1,782 0 1 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 2017 24–27 47.1% #45 1,798 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2018 44–22 66.7% #11 2,096 0 4 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2019 27–26 50.9% #17 1,909 0 4 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 2020 16–14 53.3% #20 1,863 0 4 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 2021 35–24 59.3% #29 1,906 0 4 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2022 37–25 59.7% #20 1,974 0 4 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2023 34–18 65.4% #15 1,958 0 5 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2024 37–22 62.7% #19 1,939 0 7 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 2025 32–24 57.1% #17 1,869 0 7 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 2026 19–18 51.4% #50 1,834 0 7 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Karen Khachanov Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2013 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2016 8 5 13 61.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
21 2017 6 17 23 26.1% 13 8 21 61.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2018 33 15 48 68.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
23 2019 16 17 33 48.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 2020 12 11 23 52.2% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2021 25 15 40 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2022 23 16 39 59.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
27 2023 24 13 37 64.9% 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 2024 28 15 43 65.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2025 15 15 30 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2026 11 10 21 52.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 204 153 357 57.1% 83 60 143 58.0% 34 20 54 63.0% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 546/557 of Karen Khachanov's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Karen Khachanov Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2013 5/5 6.6 2.6 62.1% 67.8% 49.4% 60.4% 45.8% 61.5% 33.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 2/2 4.5 3.5 58.8% 60.3% 42.0% 55.0% 41.7% 52.7% 31.3% 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 2016 22/22 8.4 3.1 56.9% 74.4% 52.0% 61.7% 42.2% 64.8% 37.5% 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
21 2017 51/51 8.0 3.6 56.1% 74.5% 50.3% 56.4% 36.7% 63.8% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2018 66/66 9.9 2.3 64.2% 76.7% 53.9% 65.5% 47.1% 68.4% 38.0% 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 2019 53/53 7.6 3.2 62.0% 72.9% 52.0% 60.0% 41.5% 65.0% 35.6% 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 2020 30/30 6.5 2.8 63.1% 70.5% 52.6% 53.8% 48.0% 63.8% 37.2% 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2021 53/59 7.4 2.6 62.9% 73.2% 51.6% 65.8% 38.3% 65.5% 37.2% 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 2022 61/62 7.8 2.6 64.2% 73.5% 50.7% 61.8% 42.8% 65.3% 35.7% 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 2023 52/52 7.0 1.9 63.8% 74.7% 54.2% 62.1% 45.4% 67.1% 38.6% 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2024 58/59 7.7 1.7 64.8% 74.9% 53.0% 60.8% 46.8% 67.1% 36.8% 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 2025 56/56 7.0 2.4 62.8% 74.4% 52.6% 54.4% 41.1% 66.2% 37.9% 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 2026 37/40 8.2 2.2 65.4% 74.5% 54.4% 64.3% 38.6% 67.4% 36.4% 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
Career — 546/557 7.8 2.5 62.7% 74.1% 52.4% 60.8% 42.7% 65.9% 36.9% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Karen Khachanov Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2013 1559 113.0 -2.60 -0.02 0.870 48.3% +23 — — 54.5% -0.27 1–0 2–0 — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 1534 102.1 -1.81 -2.67 0.661 42.6% — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–2 2–0 — +0.11 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 2015 1532 100.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 2016 1783 138.3 +0.69 +0.76 1.064 51.2% -29 -138 — 56.9% +0.40 5–5 (50%) 5–8 (38%) 99.6 -0.21 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 2017 1798 152.4 +0.87 -0.10 0.991 49.7% -157 +54 -48 46.6% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 15–19 (44%) 102.3 -1.26 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2018 2097 171.1 +4.24 +2.57 1.202 52.9% -42 -192 -202 63.7% +0.89 9–9 (50%) 20–22 (48%) 103.6 -2.29 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20
23 2019 1910 158.9 +0.91 +0.70 1.015 49.9% -3 +53 -8 50.0% +0.03 10–10 (50%) 13–18 (42%) 93.6 +0.67 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24
24 2020 1863 151.9 +0.79 +0.51 1.027 50.3% -16 +105 — 54.9% +0.16 5–9 (36%) 11–7 (61%) 95.1 +0.60 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95
25 2021 1906 157.9 +2.03 +1.16 1.078 51.3% 0 +21 +25 59.0% +0.45 11–15 (42%) 18–12 (60%) 96.3 -1.74 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72
26 2022 1974 159.4 +2.13 +0.62 1.029 50.4% -11 +2 -45 53.7% +0.19 14–6 (70%) 13–16 (45%) 102.9 -1.74 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11
27 2023 1958 159.2 +3.28 +2.73 1.170 52.4% -10 +63 — 61.4% +0.73 7–5 (58%) 11–7 (61%) 102.6 -0.40 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22
28 2024 1940 156.0 +2.89 +1.58 1.119 51.6% +22 +56 -89 59.6% +0.53 8–10 (44%) 19–12 (61%) 97.1 +3.23 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44
29 2025 1869 154.2 +1.94 +2.47 1.122 51.7% -18 +90 +60 56.7% +0.50 11–15 (42%) 15–14 (52%) 93.5 +0.50 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04
30 2026 1835 139.6 +2.62 +0.20 1.118 51.8% +13 +30 +39 53.6% +0.56 8–9 (47%) 8–15 (35%) 92.3 +2.86 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2097 161.8 +2.15 +1.29 1.083 51.2% -18 +20 -26 56.1% +0.39 97–104 (48%) 152–150 (50%) 95.8 +0.09 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.