H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Karen Khachanov vs Mikael Ymer H2H: 2-0
Karen Khachanov holds a 2–0 lead over Mikael Ymer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Karen Khachanov leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karen Khachanov won the 2021 Paris Masters second round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Sweden
Age 27
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2021* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Karen Khachanov | 6-4 7-5 | Mikael Ymer | Match data |
| Jan 24, 2020* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Karen Khachanov | 6-2 2-6 6-4 3-6 7-6(8) | Mikael Ymer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karen Khachanov | #26 | #8 | 3,280 | 2,096 | 312 | 229 | 57.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Mikael Ymer | #626 | #50 | 981 | 1,861 | 58 | 74 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karen Khachanov | Mikael Ymer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #596 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2013 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #451 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #497 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #255 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #53 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #45 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #94 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #11 | 2,096 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #94 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #17 | 1,909 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #136 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #29 | 1,877 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #15 | 1,959 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #19 | 1,938 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |