H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Karl Meiler vs Rod Frawley H2H: 1-1
Karl Meiler and Rod Frawley are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rod Frawley leads 1–0 on clay, while Karl Meiler leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rod Frawley won the 1980 Hamburg second round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 73
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 1980* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Rod Frawley | 6-2 6-4 | Karl Meiler | Match data |
| Mar 2, 1979* | Lagos | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Karl Meiler | 6-1 1-6 6-3 | Rod Frawley | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karl Meiler | #920 | #20 | 0 | 1,894 | 252 | 189 | 57.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Rod Frawley | #483 | #43 | 0 | 1,812 | 112 | 145 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karl Meiler | Rod Frawley | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1968 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1970 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1971 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1972 | 15–5 | 75.0% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1973 | 47–28 | 62.7% | #32 | 1,793 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #173 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1974 | 42–26 | 61.8% | #67 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #142 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1975 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #31 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #86 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1976 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #54 | 1,818 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #44 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1977 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,788 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #89 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1978 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #127 | 1,699 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #87 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1979 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #169 | 1,653 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #100 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #238 | 1,603 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #385 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #238 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1982 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #270 | 1,554 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #142 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,588 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #452 | 1,590 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |