H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Karl Meiler vs Zeljko Franulovic H2H: 1-3
Zeljko Franulovic holds a 3–1 lead over Karl Meiler in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Zeljko Franulovic leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Zeljko Franulovic won the 1980 Munich third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 1980* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Zeljko Franulovic | 6-3 6-2 | Karl Meiler | Match data |
| May 28, 1978* | Munich | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Zeljko Franulovic | 6-1 6-2 | Karl Meiler | Match data |
| Apr 8, 1976* | Nice | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Zeljko Franulovic | 6-7 6-4 6-1 | Karl Meiler | Match data |
| Aug 20, 1975* | Boston | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Karl Meiler | 6-2 6-3 | Zeljko Franulovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karl Meiler | #920 | #20 | 0 | 1,894 | 252 | 189 | 57.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Zeljko Franulovic | #616 | #30 | 0 | 2,014 | 407 | 307 | 57.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karl Meiler | Zeljko Franulovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1968 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1970 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1971 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 47–20 | 70.1% | — | 1,864 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1972 | 15–5 | 75.0% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 64–29 | 68.8% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1973 | 47–28 | 62.7% | #32 | 1,793 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 59–28 | 67.8% | — | 1,921 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 1974 | 42–26 | 61.8% | #67 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1975 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #31 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #70 | 1,706 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1976 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #54 | 1,818 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #77 | 1,657 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1977 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,788 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #68 | 1,747 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 1978 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #127 | 1,699 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #44 | 1,916 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 1979 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #169 | 1,653 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #42 | 1,762 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #238 | 1,603 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #38 | 1,800 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #238 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #97 | 1,768 | 0 | 13 |
| 33 | 1982 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #270 | 1,554 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,678 | 0 | 13 |
| 34 | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #142 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #100 | 1,648 | 0 | 13 |
| 35 | 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,588 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,616 | 0 | 13 |
| 36 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #452 | 1,590 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,567 | 0 | 13 |