Karol Kucera
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | 5 | 5 | 10 | Sep 21, 2000 | H2H |
| Fabrice Santoro | 7 | 2 | 9 | Jun 13, 2003 | H2H |
| Alex Corretja | 1 | 7 | 8 | Oct 3, 2002 | H2H |
| Cedric Pioline | 3 | 5 | 8 | Oct 31, 2001 | H2H |
| Wayne Ferreira | 4 | 3 | 7 | Jun 25, 2004 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Karol Kucera holds a 3–0 lead over Daniel Vacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Karol Kucera leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Karol Kucera won the 1999 Wimbledon round of 32 6-1 6-3 3-6 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karol Kucera | 6-1 6-3 3-6 7-6(4) | Daniel Vacek | Match data | Jun 27, 1999* | R32 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Karol Kucera | 4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | Daniel Vacek | Match data | Oct 22, 1998* | R32 | Ostrava | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Carpet |
| Karol Kucera | 7-6(4) 6-7(5) 2-6 6-0 6-1 | Daniel Vacek | Match data | Jan 23, 1998* | R64 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karol Kucera | #1,540 | #6 | 2,732 | 1,995 | 261 | 233 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,821 | 171 | 220 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karol Kucera | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #352 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #159 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #63 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #24 | 1,832 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 48–27 | 64.0% | #8 | 1,845 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #17 | 1,852 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 23–29 | 44.2% | #71 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #73 | 1,767 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #101 | 1,722 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #83 | 1,756 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #40 | 1,763 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2004 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #91 | 1,668 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #310 | 1,665 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Karol Kucera | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1991 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1991 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 5 | 12 | 17 | 29.4% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1993 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 23 | 1997 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 14 | 7 | 21 | 66.7% | 1994 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% |
| 24 | 1998 | 26 | 12 | 38 | 68.4% | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1995 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% |
| 25 | 1999 | 16 | 9 | 25 | 64.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 1996 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% |
| 26 | 2000 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 45.8% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1997 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% |
| 27 | 2001 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1998 | 17 | 17 | 34 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% |
| 28 | 2002 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 20 | 17 | 37 | 54.1% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% |
| 29 | 2003 | 19 | 9 | 28 | 67.9% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2000 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2001 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 119 | 98 | 217 | 54.8% | 57 | 76 | 133 | 42.9% | 36 | 25 | 61 | 59.0% | 49 | 34 | 83 | 59.0% | — | 87 | 105 | 192 | 45.3% | 22 | 42 | 64 | 34.4% | 17 | 23 | 40 | 42.5% | 45 | 50 | 95 | 47.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 438/494 of Karol Kucera's and 346/391 of Daniel Vacek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Karol Kucera | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 1991 | 1/2 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 36.5% | 69.6% | 65.0% | 85.7% | 66.7% | 66.7% | 45.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 43.3% | 73.1% | 41.2% | 42.9% | 33.3% | 55.0% | 36.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 4/4 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 46.2% | 72.2% | 48.1% | 52.7% | 42.3% | 59.9% | 33.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 24/26 | 3.7 | 4.2 | 53.8% | 67.6% | 46.5% | 50.8% | 47.3% | 57.9% | 41.2% | 1991 | 4/4 | 3.8 | 2.8 | 61.6% | 71.4% | 42.5% | 43.4% | 19.0% | 59.1% | 34.1% |
| 21 | 1995 | 41/48 | 5.1 | 5.3 | 52.7% | 68.2% | 46.6% | 57.7% | 40.4% | 58.2% | 40.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 35/43 | 4.0 | 5.2 | 55.6% | 68.2% | 47.1% | 55.0% | 42.6% | 58.7% | 39.9% | 1993 | 32/35 | 6.8 | 4.4 | 60.0% | 72.6% | 54.6% | 58.6% | 34.4% | 65.5% | 31.8% |
| 23 | 1997 | 53/60 | 3.8 | 5.3 | 55.2% | 69.6% | 47.6% | 49.2% | 46.5% | 60.0% | 40.5% | 1994 | 49/52 | 7.0 | 5.4 | 59.5% | 74.6% | 50.5% | 56.6% | 36.0% | 65.1% | 34.7% |
| 24 | 1998 | 63/75 | 5.8 | 5.0 | 56.4% | 72.6% | 49.9% | 61.2% | 49.8% | 62.8% | 43.3% | 1995 | 50/61 | 8.1 | 4.3 | 59.9% | 75.7% | 51.4% | 61.3% | 37.4% | 65.9% | 35.7% |
| 25 | 1999 | 53/58 | 5.1 | 3.9 | 57.9% | 72.9% | 51.3% | 53.7% | 49.6% | 63.8% | 43.3% | 1996 | 48/52 | 7.3 | 5.1 | 56.7% | 76.2% | 49.0% | 53.1% | 39.3% | 64.6% | 33.5% |
| 26 | 2000 | 38/45 | 6.4 | 5.4 | 52.1% | 73.9% | 48.1% | 58.4% | 42.2% | 61.5% | 41.1% | 1997 | 41/45 | 8.2 | 6.8 | 51.8% | 76.0% | 46.0% | 59.0% | 36.2% | 61.5% | 34.9% |
| 27 | 2001 | 23/24 | 4.9 | 5.0 | 55.4% | 70.4% | 45.3% | 42.0% | 42.3% | 59.0% | 40.2% | 1998 | 46/54 | 7.0 | 5.1 | 56.6% | 74.9% | 47.3% | 61.9% | 39.4% | 62.8% | 35.5% |
| 28 | 2002 | 31/34 | 5.1 | 5.5 | 58.8% | 68.5% | 45.8% | 47.5% | 52.6% | 58.2% | 39.6% | 1999 | 50/60 | 4.7 | 4.6 | 56.5% | 70.1% | 47.7% | 64.0% | 37.1% | 60.1% | 36.2% |
| 29 | 2003 | 40/42 | 5.4 | 4.4 | 57.3% | 71.1% | 48.7% | 55.8% | 46.1% | 61.7% | 40.0% | 2000 | 15/17 | 4.2 | 5.4 | 53.6% | 64.8% | 40.6% | 42.9% | 30.9% | 53.9% | 30.4% |
| 30 | 2004 | 23/24 | 5.8 | 4.4 | 61.2% | 70.9% | 49.4% | 52.3% | 49.4% | 62.6% | 38.4% | 2001 | 9/9 | 6.8 | 3.4 | 54.2% | 67.3% | 50.2% | 50.6% | 27.2% | 59.5% | 29.2% |
| 31 | 2005 | 8/8 | 6.0 | 4.8 | 56.5% | 62.9% | 51.9% | 60.7% | 57.6% | 57.9% | 34.1% | 2002 | 2/2 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 58.4% | 71.8% | 37.5% | 45.7% | 36.5% | 57.6% | 36.6% |
| Career | — | 438/494 | 5.1 | 4.9 | 55.8% | 70.5% | 48.3% | 54.2% | 46.6% | 60.7% | 40.8% | — | 346/391 | 6.8 | 5.0 | 57.1% | 73.7% | 48.8% | 58.1% | 36.5% | 63.0% | 34.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Karol Kucera | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1991 | 1510 | 99.2 | -0.34 | -0.73 | 1.352 | 55.2% | — | — | — | 50.0% | -1.50 | — | — | — | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 1506 | 107.8 | +1.94 | +0.49 | 0.815 | 45.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 1493 | 107.7 | -0.38 | -0.91 | 0.835 | 47.3% | — | +43 | — | 30.0% | -1.30 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 1617 | 124.2 | -2.17 | +1.05 | 0.978 | 49.4% | -93 | +34 | — | 45.2% | -0.31 | 5–2 (71%) | 2–4 (33%) | — | +0.29 | 1991 | 1490 | 102.2 | -1.04 | -0.09 | 0.834 | 46.2% | — | — | — | 22.2% | -1.67 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.10 |
| 21 | 1995 | 1625 | 128.1 | -3.11 | +1.46 | 0.961 | 49.3% | -21 | -56 | +36 | 46.1% | -0.47 | 8–9 (47%) | 9–6 (60%) | — | +1.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 1657 | 140.0 | -1.67 | +1.61 | 0.965 | 49.3% | -9 | -82 | +62 | 43.1% | -0.04 | 8–2 (80%) | 5–14 (26%) | — | -0.90 | 1993 | 1560 | 126.4 | +2.79 | -4.51 | 0.922 | 49.1% | -2 | +9 | -4 | 41.1% | -0.61 | 3–7 (30%) | 7–9 (44%) | — | +0.29 |
| 23 | 1997 | 1832 | 145.3 | -1.29 | +2.80 | 1.013 | 50.0% | -21 | -141 | -84 | 49.6% | +0.04 | 11–9 (55%) | 6–4 (60%) | — | -1.69 | 1994 | 1732 | 143.4 | +3.08 | -2.24 | 0.992 | 49.9% | -14 | -131 | -90 | 47.5% | -0.12 | 12–9 (57%) | 13–15 (46%) | — | -1.41 |
| 24 | 1998 | 1846 | 161.4 | +0.91 | +5.75 | 1.163 | 53.0% | +34 | -55 | -157 | 59.8% | +0.70 | 16–13 (55%) | 15–13 (54%) | — | -2.10 | 1995 | 1798 | 148.9 | +3.89 | -1.17 | 1.046 | 50.7% | +14 | -171 | -195 | 48.7% | +0.03 | 10–11 (48%) | 15–18 (45%) | — | -1.99 |
| 25 | 1999 | 1853 | 152.3 | +1.99 | +5.08 | 1.196 | 53.0% | +24 | -89 | -80 | 64.6% | +1.00 | 7–9 (44%) | 13–8 (62%) | — | -0.21 | 1996 | 1692 | 140.7 | +2.32 | -3.52 | 0.945 | 49.3% | +10 | -77 | -50 | 45.5% | -0.25 | 12–11 (52%) | 14–11 (56%) | — | -2.02 |
| 26 | 2000 | 1767 | 147.6 | -0.07 | +3.71 | 1.065 | 51.2% | -8 | +56 | +26 | 51.3% | +0.32 | 6–6 (50%) | 5–9 (36%) | — | -2.34 | 1997 | 1670 | 134.8 | -0.60 | -1.91 | 0.906 | 48.1% | +38 | -50 | -60 | 41.8% | -0.61 | 6–7 (46%) | 13–12 (52%) | — | -0.33 |
| 27 | 2001 | 1723 | 133.9 | -1.96 | +1.87 | 0.979 | 49.4% | +28 | +25 | — | 45.3% | -0.11 | 2–3 (40%) | 4–7 (36%) | — | -1.09 | 1998 | 1672 | 143.3 | +0.67 | -1.11 | 0.956 | 49.4% | +16 | -20 | -40 | 48.1% | -0.21 | 6–8 (43%) | 13–10 (57%) | — | +0.31 |
| 28 | 2002 | 1756 | 129.2 | -2.48 | +2.17 | 0.948 | 48.8% | +31 | -87 | -5 | 48.3% | -0.36 | 10–3 (77%) | 7–5 (58%) | — | -1.25 | 1999 | 1741 | 133.9 | -1.09 | -1.27 | 0.909 | 48.6% | +1 | -191 | -65 | 46.2% | -0.17 | 9–4 (69%) | 7–11 (39%) | — | +0.89 |
| 29 | 2003 | 1763 | 141.0 | -0.44 | +2.57 | 1.044 | 50.7% | +37 | -184 | +57 | 57.8% | +0.34 | 5–5 (50%) | 15–10 (60%) | — | -0.62 | 2000 | 1629 | 122.6 | -4.37 | -4.38 | 0.659 | 42.4% | +53 | -125 | — | 27.5% | -2.08 | 1–2 (33%) | 4–1 (80%) | — | -1.16 |
| 30 | 2004 | 1668 | 134.1 | -0.65 | +2.30 | 1.027 | 50.5% | +66 | -105 | +102 | 43.1% | -0.25 | 4–3 (57%) | 6–8 (43%) | — | -1.86 | 2001 | 1595 | 122.1 | -0.70 | -2.81 | 0.721 | 45.3% | +49 | — | — | 23.8% | -1.67 | — | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.96 |
| 31 | 2005 | 1665 | 103.1 | -1.58 | -1.94 | 0.810 | 46.0% | +47 | — | +72 | 42.1% | -0.84 | — | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.40 | 2002 | 1578 | 111.7 | +0.38 | -0.21 | 0.865 | 46.5% | — | — | — | 16.7% | -1.17 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.38 |
| Career | — | 1996 | 149.0 | -0.72 | +2.99 | 1.038 | 50.6% | +12 | -50 | -5 | 51.8% | +0.15 | 82–65 (56%) | 89–90 (50%) | 102.0 | -2.25 | — | 1822 | 143.7 | +1.22 | -2.21 | 0.930 | 48.9% | +12 | -96 | -70 | 44.3% | -0.37 | 59–59 (50%) | 88–91 (49%) | 102.9 | -1.71 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | 5 | 5 | 10 | Sep 21, 2000 | H2H |
| Fabrice Santoro | 7 | 2 | 9 | Jun 13, 2003 | H2H |
| Alex Corretja | 1 | 7 | 8 | Oct 3, 2002 | H2H |
| Cedric Pioline | 3 | 5 | 8 | Oct 31, 2001 | H2H |
| Wayne Ferreira | 4 | 3 | 7 | Jun 25, 2004 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 4 | 15 | 19 | Jan 3, 2002 | H2H |
| Wayne Ferreira | 0 | 10 | 10 | Jan 22, 1999 | H2H |
| Marcelo Rios | 2 | 6 | 8 | Sep 27, 2001 | H2H |
| Patrick Rafter | 1 | 5 | 6 | Jun 27, 2001 | H2H |
| Michael Stich | 1 | 5 | 6 | Feb 13, 1997 | H2H |