H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Kei Nishikori vs Milos Raonic H2H: 4-2

Kei Nishikori holds a 4–2 lead over Milos Raonic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Kei Nishikori leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2015 Brisbane semifinal 6-7(4) 7-6(4) 7-6(4).

Japan Age 36 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 2
6 main draw meetings
CAN Age 35 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 10, 2015* Brisbane ATP 250 SF Hard Milos Raonic #8 6-7(4) 7-6(4) 7-6(4) Kei Nishikori #5 Match data
Oct 5, 2014* Tokyo ATP 500 F Hard Kei Nishikori #7 7-6(5) 4-6 6-4 Milos Raonic #8 Match data
Sep 3, 2014* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Kei Nishikori #238 4-6 7-6(4) 6-7(6) 7-5 6-4 Milos Raonic #6 Match data
Jul 1, 2014* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Milos Raonic #9 4-6 6-1 7-6(4) 6-3 Kei Nishikori #12 Match data
May 9, 2014* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Kei Nishikori #12 7-6(5) 7-6(5) Milos Raonic #9 Match data
Oct 7, 2012* Tokyo ATP 500 F Hard Kei Nishikori #17 7-6(5) 3-6 6-0 Milos Raonic #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kei Nishikori #464 #4 6,385 2,245 424 226 65.2% 0 0 0 5 7 12
Milos Raonic #634 #3 5,450 2,246 369 186 66.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kei Nishikori Milos Raonic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2007 3–5 37.5% #286 1,576 0 0
18 2008 16–10 61.5% #63 1,792 0 1 2009 0–1 0.0% #373 1,535 0 0
19 2009 3–6 33.3% #418 1,743 0 1 2010 3–4 42.9% #156 1,651 0 0
20 2010 3–9 25.0% #98 1,743 0 1 2011 30–18 62.5% #31 1,839 0 1
21 2011 32–22 59.3% #25 1,922 0 1 2012 42–20 67.7% #13 1,987 0 3
22 2012 32–17 65.3% #19 1,971 0 2 2013 41–21 66.1% #11 2,034 0 5
23 2013 34–19 64.2% #17 1,940 0 3 2014 47–20 70.1% #8 2,087 0 6
24 2014 52–15 77.6% #5 2,211 0 7 2015 32–15 68.1% #14 2,047 0 7
25 2015 51–17 75.0% #8 2,131 0 10 2016 52–19 73.2% #3 2,143 0 8
26 2016 52–20 72.2% #5 2,151 0 11 2017 29–14 67.4% #24 2,053 0 8
27 2017 30–14 68.2% #22 2,067 0 11 2018 31–18 63.3% #18 1,952 0 8
28 2018 43–21 67.2% #9 2,105 0 11 2019 23–13 63.9% #31 1,919 0 8
29 2019 29–14 67.4% #13 2,001 0 12 2020 23–10 69.7% #14 1,996 0 8
30 2020 2–4 33.3% #41 1,911 0 12 2021 6–4 60.0% #70 1,964 0 8
31 2021 24–15 61.5% #47 1,945 0 12
32 2023 4–4 50.0% #317 1,909 0 8
33 2023 2–1 66.7% #352 1,938 0 12 2024 6–5 54.5% #238 1,903 0 8
34 2024 7–8 46.7% #106 1,863 0 12
35 2025 9–9 50.0% #156 1,809 0 12