H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 01:16 UTC
Kenneth Carlsen vs Alex Obrien H2H: 2-2
Kenneth Carlsen and Alex Obrien are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kenneth Carlsen leads 1–0 on carpet, while Alex Obrien leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alex Obrien won the 1998 Wimbledon first round 4-6 4-6 6-4 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1998* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Alex Obrien | 4-6 4-6 6-4 6-3 6-4 | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
| Oct 16, 1997* | Ostrava | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Kenneth Carlsen | 7-6(8) 6-7(6) 7-6(9) | Alex Obrien | Match data |
| Oct 4, 1997* | Beijing | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Kenneth Carlsen | 7-5 5-7 7-6(4) | Alex Obrien | Match data |
| Apr 25, 1997* | Orlando | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Alex Obrien | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth Carlsen | #1,158 | #41 | 791 | 1,754 | 239 | 273 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Alex Obrien | — | — | — | 1,806 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kenneth Carlsen | Alex Obrien | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1992 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #92 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #108 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #72 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #73 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #83 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #153 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #65 | 1,743 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #84 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #137 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #498 | 1,487 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |