H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Kenneth Carlsen vs Alexander Volkov H2H: 1-3
Alexander Volkov holds a 3–1 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Alexander Volkov leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alexander Volkov won the 1997 Tashkent third round 6-4 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
DEN
Age 53
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
RUS
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 1997* | Tashkent | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Alexander Volkov | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
| Mar 17, 1995* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Alexander Volkov | 6-2 6-4 | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
| Jan 8, 1994* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Alexander Volkov | 7-5 6-0 | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
| Mar 5, 1992* | Copenhagen | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Kenneth Carlsen | 6-4 6-7(6) 6-4 | Alexander Volkov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth Carlsen | #1,158 | #41 | 791 | 1,754 | 239 | 273 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Alexander Volkov | #1,324 | #14 | 1,538 | 1,921 | 291 | 245 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kenneth Carlsen | Alexander Volkov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #529 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #92 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #108 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #72 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #50 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #73 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #24 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #25 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1998 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #83 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,825 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1999 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 44–28 | 61.1% | #18 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2001 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #153 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #47 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2002 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #65 | 1,743 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #98 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2003 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #195 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2004 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #84 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #137 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #498 | 1,487 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |