H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Kenneth Carlsen vs Anders Jarryd H2H: 2-0
Kenneth Carlsen holds a 2–0 lead over Anders Jarryd in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kenneth Carlsen leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kenneth Carlsen won the 1995 Bologna third round 6-4 6-7(4) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
DEN
Age 53
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 65
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 1995* | Bologna | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Kenneth Carlsen | 6-4 6-7(4) 7-5 | Anders Jarryd | Match data |
| Feb 24, 1994* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Kenneth Carlsen | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | Anders Jarryd | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth Carlsen | #1,158 | #41 | 791 | 1,754 | 239 | 273 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Anders Jarryd | #1,316 | #5 | 957 | 2,059 | 371 | 251 | 59.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kenneth Carlsen | Anders Jarryd | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #182 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #92 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #58 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1994 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #108 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,876 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1995 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #72 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #6 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1996 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #73 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 1,982 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #19 | 1,883 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1998 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #83 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,957 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1999 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #32 | 1,820 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #31 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2001 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #153 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #73 | 1,807 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2002 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #65 | 1,743 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2003 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #150 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2004 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #84 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #67 | 1,624 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 2006 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #137 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #124 | 1,643 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #498 | 1,487 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #410 | 1,528 | 0 | 8 |