H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Kenneth Carlsen vs Andrea Gaudenzi H2H: 2-1

Kenneth Carlsen holds a 2–1 lead over Andrea Gaudenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kenneth Carlsen leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Andrea Gaudenzi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kenneth Carlsen won the 2001 Washington second round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kenneth Carlsen
DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Andrea Gaudenzi
ITA Age 52 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 15, 2001* Washington ATP 250 R64 Hard Kenneth Carlsen #276 6-2 6-4 Andrea Gaudenzi #56 Match data
Jul 17, 1996* Washington ATP 250 R64 Hard Kenneth Carlsen #73 4-6 6-3 7-6(8) Andrea Gaudenzi #39 Match data
May 20, 1994* Bologna ATP 250 R16 Clay Andrea Gaudenzi #35 6-2 6-3 Kenneth Carlsen #112 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 239 273 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Andrea Gaudenzi #1,441 #18 1,522 1,865 204 220 48.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Andrea Gaudenzi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #861 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1991 0–3 0.0% #632 1,456 0 0
19 1992 10–7 58.8% #69 1,587 0 0 1993 17–10 63.0% #60 1,670 0 0
20 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,575 0 0 1994 36–29 55.4% #24 1,773 0 0
21 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0 1995 31–25 55.4% #22 1,680 0 0
22 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,693 0 0 1996 24–26 48.0% #55 1,654 0 0
23 1996 17–22 43.6% #73 1,620 0 0 1997 14–20 41.2% #57 1,640 0 0
24 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,654 0 0 1998 30–24 55.6% #44 1,677 0 1
25 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,621 0 1 1999 13–14 48.1% #84 1,645 0 1
26 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,657 0 1 2000 8–16 33.3% #101 1,592 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2001 17–19 47.2% #54 1,693 0 3
28 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,679 0 1 2002 11–26 29.7% #120 1,534 0 3
29 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2 2003 3–7 30.0% #293 1,533 0 3
30 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,595 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,581 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,609 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,487 0 3 — — — — — — —