H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Kenneth Carlsen vs Andrei Cherkasov H2H: 0-1

Andrei Cherkasov holds a 1–0 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrei Cherkasov leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrei Cherkasov won the 1993 Munich third round 7-6(4) 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kenneth Carlsen
DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Andrei Cherkasov
RUS Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 29, 1993* Munich ATP 250 R32 Clay Andrei Cherkasov #49 7-6(4) 7-6(5) Kenneth Carlsen #46 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 239 273 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Andrei Cherkasov #1,174 #13 1,320 1,897 170 198 46.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Andrei Cherkasov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1988 0–1 0.0% #236 1,497 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1989 13–16 44.8% #82 1,572 0 0
19 1992 10–7 58.8% #69 1,587 0 0 1990 35–26 57.4% #21 1,877 0 1
20 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,575 0 0 1991 37–29 56.1% #21 1,815 0 2
21 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0 1992 29–29 50.0% #32 1,711 0 2
22 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,693 0 0 1993 34–31 52.3% #37 1,753 0 2
23 1996 17–22 43.6% #73 1,620 0 0 1994 8–27 22.9% #172 1,554 0 2
24 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,654 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #184 1,535 0 2
25 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,621 0 1 1996 3–12 20.0% #133 1,463 0 2
26 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,657 0 1 1997 5–10 33.3% #164 1,485 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 1998 0–3 0.0% #164 1,462 0 2
28 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,679 0 1 1999 3–6 33.3% #217 1,483 0 2
29 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2 2000 1–3 25.0% #198 1,452 0 2
30 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,595 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,581 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,609 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,487 0 3 — — — — — — —