H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Kenneth Carlsen vs Andrei Olhovskiy H2H: 2-1
Kenneth Carlsen holds a 2–1 lead over Andrei Olhovskiy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kenneth Carlsen leads 1–0 on clay, while Andrei Olhovskiy leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Andrei Olhovskiy won the 1993 Rosmalen third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
DEN
Age 53
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 1993* | Rosmalen | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Andrei Olhovskiy | 6-3 6-4 | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
| May 12, 1993* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Kenneth Carlsen | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | Andrei Olhovskiy | Match data |
| Oct 1, 1992* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Kenneth Carlsen | 7-6(4) 7-6(6) | Andrei Olhovskiy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth Carlsen | #1,158 | #41 | 791 | 1,754 | 239 | 273 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Andrei Olhovskiy | #1,310 | #49 | 690 | 1,750 | 113 | 162 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kenneth Carlsen | Andrei Olhovskiy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1992 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #92 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #108 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #72 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #73 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #302 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #83 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #136 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #80 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #65 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2001 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #153 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #97 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2002 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #65 | 1,743 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #118 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2003 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2004 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #84 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 0–14 | 0.0% | #442 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,470 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2006 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #137 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #498 | 1,487 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |