H2H data updated: 2026-07-21 02:15 UTC
Kenneth Carlsen vs Andrei Pavel H2H: 1-1
Kenneth Carlsen and Andrei Pavel are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Kenneth Carlsen won the 2004 Wimbledon second round 7-6(9) 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
DEN
Age 53
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2004* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Kenneth Carlsen | 7-6(9) 6-4 6-3 | Andrei Pavel | Match data |
| Jun 26, 2002* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Andrei Pavel | 6-4 6-1 3-6 6-3 | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth Carlsen | #1,158 | #41 | 791 | 1,754 | 239 | 273 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Andrei Pavel | #890 | #13 | 1,550 | 1,904 | 249 | 248 | 50.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kenneth Carlsen | Andrei Pavel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #489 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #92 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #408 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #108 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #214 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #72 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #73 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #68 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1998 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #83 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #41 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1999 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #27 | 1,788 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2001 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #153 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #26 | 1,801 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2002 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #65 | 1,743 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #69 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2003 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #18 | 1,772 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2004 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #84 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #80 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #113 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2006 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #137 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #498 | 1,487 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1142 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #600 | 1,561 | 0 | 3 |