H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Kenneth Carlsen vs Andy Roddick H2H: 1-2
Andy Roddick holds a 2–1 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Andy Roddick leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andy Roddick won the 2006 San Jose fourth round 6-3 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
DEN
Age 53
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2006* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Andy Roddick | 6-3 1-6 6-3 | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
| Feb 19, 2005* | Memphis | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Kenneth Carlsen | (w/o) | Andy Roddick | Match data |
| Apr 15, 2004* | Houston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Andy Roddick | 6-1 7-5 | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth Carlsen | #1,158 | #41 | 791 | 1,754 | 239 | 273 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Andy Roddick | #40 | #1 | 5,800 | 2,177 | 577 | 196 | 74.6% | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 22 | 32 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kenneth Carlsen | Andy Roddick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #156 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1992 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,923 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1993 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #92 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 71–18 | 79.8% | #1 | 2,092 | 1 | 11 |
| 21 | 1994 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #108 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #2 | 2,078 | 1 | 15 |
| 22 | 1995 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #72 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,031 | 1 | 20 |
| 23 | 1996 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #73 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #6 | 1,998 | 1 | 21 |
| 24 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 48–16 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,009 | 1 | 23 |
| 25 | 1998 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #83 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,008 | 1 | 26 |
| 26 | 1999 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #7 | 2,046 | 1 | 27 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 1 | 29 |
| 28 | 2001 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #153 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,024 | 1 | 30 |
| 29 | 2002 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #65 | 1,743 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #39 | 1,987 | 1 | 32 |
| 30 | 2003 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #84 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #137 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #498 | 1,487 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |